» Articles » PMID: 17696228

Low-dose Tenofovir is More Potent Than Adefovir and is Effective in Controlling HBV Viremia in Chronic HBeAg-negative Hepatitis B

Overview
Specialty Gastroenterology
Date 2007 Aug 19
PMID 17696228
Citations 8
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Aim: To study the efficacy of tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) at low dose in a small open trial of chronic hepatitis B patients with advanced stage disease.

Methods: Eleven patients were treated with TDF 75 mg for a median period of 80 (range, 24-576) wk and then 7 cases were shifted to an adefovir 10 mg treatment group. All patients had been pre-treated with lamivudine: 5 had YMDD resistant mutants and 6 wild-type virus. When TDF was started, 4 patients had low-level viremia and 6 were PCR-negative.

Results: During TDF treatment, PCR remained negative in 10 patients, transaminase levels were normal and no significant viral breakthrough was observed. The drug was well tolerated in all cases. When TDF 75 mg was substituted with adefovir 10 mg, 3 out of 7 patients had a persistent viral rebound (2700-130,000 copies/mL), in whom lamivudine had to be reintroduced.

Conclusion: Low-dose TDF monotherapy can control HBV viremia for an extended period of time without the emergence of resistance and is more potent than adefovir at the standard dosage. The use of a reduced dose of TDF could diminish the cost of therapy in low-income countries, but further studies in a larger population and in HBeAg-positive subjects are needed.

Citing Articles

Effectiveness and Safety of Low Dose of Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate in Malagasy Patients with Chronic Hepatitis B.

Razafindrazoto C, Rabenjanahary T, Rakotozafindrabe A, Rakotondrasoa S, Randriamifidy N, Rasolonjatovo A Biomed Res Int. 2022; 2022:1654620.

PMID: 35686236 PMC: 9173890. DOI: 10.1155/2022/1654620.


Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate is superior to lamivudine plus adefovir in lamivudine-resistant chronic hepatitis B patients.

Yang D, Xie Y, Zhao N, Pan H, Li M, Huang H World J Gastroenterol. 2015; 21(9):2746-53.

PMID: 25759545 PMC: 4351227. DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i9.2746.


Antiviral treatment of chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infections.

De Clercq E, Ferir G, Kaptein S, Neyts J Viruses. 2011; 2(6):1279-1305.

PMID: 21994680 PMC: 3185710. DOI: 10.3390/v2061279.


Current status of antiviral therapy for hepatitis B.

Lau D, Bleibel W Therap Adv Gastroenterol. 2010; 1(1):61-75.

PMID: 21180515 PMC: 3002488. DOI: 10.1177/1756283X08093944.


Current therapeutic strategies for recurrent hepatitis B virus infection after liver transplantation.

Jiang L, Yan L World J Gastroenterol. 2010; 16(20):2468-75.

PMID: 20503446 PMC: 2877176. DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v16.i20.2468.


References
1.
Kanwal F, Gralnek I, Martin P, Dulai G, Farid M, Spiegel B . Treatment alternatives for chronic hepatitis B virus infection: a cost-effectiveness analysis. Ann Intern Med. 2005; 142(10):821-31. DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-142-10-200505170-00007. View

2.
Lok A, McMahon B . Chronic hepatitis B. Hepatology. 2007; 45(2):507-39. DOI: 10.1002/hep.21513. View

3.
van Bommel F, Zollner B, Sarrazin C, Spengler U, Huppe D, Moller B . Tenofovir for patients with lamivudine-resistant hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection and high HBV DNA level during adefovir therapy. Hepatology. 2006; 44(2):318-25. DOI: 10.1002/hep.21253. View

4.
Levy V, Grant R . Antiretroviral therapy for hepatitis B virus-HIV-coinfected patients: promises and pitfalls. Clin Infect Dis. 2006; 43(7):904-10. DOI: 10.1086/507532. View

5.
van Bommel F, Berg T . Reactivation of viral replication after replacement of tenofovir by adefovir. Hepatology. 2005; 42(1):239-40. DOI: 10.1002/hep.20765. View