» Articles » PMID: 17694903

Metacomprehension for Educationally Relevant Materials: Dramatic Effects of Encoding-retrieval Interactions

Overview
Specialty Psychology
Date 2007 Aug 19
PMID 17694903
Citations 5
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

As the metacomprehension literature has grown, important discoveries pertinent to education havebeen made. For example, as students are better able to assess their knowledge and implement appropriate study strategies, presumably their acquisition and retention of course material improves. Accordingly, we consider the metacomprehension literature with an emphasis on factors that impact metacomprehension accuracy. Several studies have demonstrated that metacomprehension prediction accuracy will improve to the extent that people engage in enriched-encoding activities. More recently, research by Thomas and McDaniel (in press) has suggested that enriched-encoding manipulations interact with retrieval to impact both retention and metacomprehension and, in turn, the effectiveness of controlling subsequent study. Thus, matching enriched-encoding activities with the criterial test plays a critical role in metacomprehension accuracy and control of studying.

Citing Articles

Teachers' monitoring of students' text comprehension: can students' keywords and summaries improve teachers' judgment accuracy?.

Engelen J, Camp G, van de Pol J, de Bruin A Metacogn Learn. 2019; 13(3):287-307.

PMID: 30881262 PMC: 6394429. DOI: 10.1007/s11409-018-9187-4.


PORTAAL: A Classroom Observation Tool Assessing Evidence-Based Teaching Practices for Active Learning in Large Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics Classes.

Eddy S, Converse M, Wenderoth M CBE Life Sci Educ. 2015; 14(2):14:ar23.

PMID: 26033871 PMC: 4477739. DOI: 10.1187/cbe.14-06-0095.


Metamemory monitoring and control following retrieval practice for text.

Little J, McDaniel M Mem Cognit. 2014; 43(1):85-98.

PMID: 25135813 DOI: 10.3758/s13421-014-0453-7.


Adaptive and qualitative changes in encoding strategy with experience: evidence from the test-expectancy paradigm.

Finley J, Benjamin A J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2011; 38(3):632-52.

PMID: 22103783 PMC: 3433232. DOI: 10.1037/a0026215.


Generalizing test-enhanced learning from the laboratory to the classroom.

McDaniel M, Roediger 3rd H, McDermott K Psychon Bull Rev. 2007; 14(2):200-6.

PMID: 17694901 DOI: 10.3758/bf03194052.

References
1.
Nelson T . A comparison of current measures of the accuracy of feeling-of-knowing predictions. Psychol Bull. 1984; 95(1):109-33. View

2.
Son L, Metcalfe J . Metacognitive and control strategies in study-time allocation. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2000; 26(1):204-21. DOI: 10.1037//0278-7393.26.1.204. View

3.
Thomas A, McDaniel M . The negative cascade of incongruent generative study-test processing in memory and metacomprehension. Mem Cognit. 2007; 35(4):668-78. DOI: 10.3758/bf03193305. View

4.
Weaver 3rd C, Bryant D . Monitoring of comprehension: the role of text difficulty in metamemory for narrative and expository text. Mem Cognit. 1995; 23(1):12-22. DOI: 10.3758/bf03210553. View

5.
Rawson K, Dunlosky J, Thiede K . The rereading effect: metacomprehension accuracy improves across reading trials. Mem Cognit. 2000; 28(6):1004-10. DOI: 10.3758/bf03209348. View