» Articles » PMID: 1769280

Structure, Mitotic and Meiotic Behaviour, and Stability of Centromere-like Elements Devoid of Chromosome Arms in the Fly Megaselia Scalaris (Phoridae)

Overview
Journal Chromosoma
Specialty Molecular Biology
Date 1991 Nov 1
PMID 1769280
Citations 1
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Minute elements detected in Megaselia scalaris (Phoridae, Diptera) lack chromosome arms but carry centromeres and possess kinetochore microtubules in mitosis as well as in meiosis. These centromere-like elements (CLEs) were present in two geographically independent strains of the fly. This indicates that their origin is not a recent event in the karyotype evolution of M. scalaris and that they are rather stable constituents of the karyotype. Most often, two CLEs were found in gonial and somatic mitosis. Spermatocytes contained one CLE. Two individuals examined deviated from this rule in that a metaphase spermatogonium showed three and an anaphase spermatogonium eight CLEs. These animals are believed to have been aneuploid relative to the CLEs. An analysis of spermatogonial division revealed that the CLEs behave like the centromeres of the regular chromosomes but seem to separate precociously, since they were closer to the spindle poles in late anaphase cells. Whereas the size of the CLEs was not significantly different between mitotic cells and secondary spermatocytes, the CLEs in primary spermatocytes were larger in volume by a factor of about 4.5 than those in mitosis and meiosis II. The additional material is interpreted as a glue that holds two CLEs together. This, in turn, is a prerequisite for orderly segregation. The function of the CLEs is not known. They are considered as B chromosomes reduced to the minimum required for segregation, the centromere.

Citing Articles

Evolution of B Chromosomes: From Dispensable Parasitic Chromosomes to Essential Genomic Players.

Johnson Pokorna M, Reifova R Front Genet. 2021; 12:727570.

PMID: 34956308 PMC: 8695967. DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2021.727570.

References
1.
Haaf T, Schmid M . Analysis of double minutes and double minute-like chromatin in human and murine tumor cells using antikinetochore antibodies. Cancer Genet Cytogenet. 1988; 30(1):73-82. DOI: 10.1016/0165-4608(88)90094-5. View

2.
Ault J, Lin H, Church K . Meiosis in Drosophila melanogaster. IV. The conjunctive mechanism of the XY bivalent. Chromosoma. 1982; 86(3):309-17. DOI: 10.1007/BF00292259. View

3.
Jokelainen P . The ultrastructure and spatial organization of the metaphase kinetochore in mitotic rat cells. J Ultrastruct Res. 1967; 19(1):19-44. DOI: 10.1016/s0022-5320(67)80058-3. View

4.
Brenner S, Pepper D, Berns M, Tan E, Brinkley B . Kinetochore structure, duplication, and distribution in mammalian cells: analysis by human autoantibodies from scleroderma patients. J Cell Biol. 1981; 91(1):95-102. PMC: 2111947. DOI: 10.1083/jcb.91.1.95. View

5.
MAZIA D . Centrosomes and mitotic poles. Exp Cell Res. 1984; 153(1):1-15. DOI: 10.1016/0014-4827(84)90442-7. View