» Articles » PMID: 17690231

Male Discrimination of Receptive and Unreceptive Female Calls by Temporal Features

Overview
Journal J Exp Biol
Specialty Biology
Date 2007 Aug 11
PMID 17690231
Citations 11
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

In murky, crowded ponds in South Africa, female clawed frogs, Xenopus laevis (Daudin), vocalize to signal reproductive state. Female calls consist of acoustically similar clicks delivered in trains with characteristic rates. The rapping call of a sexually receptive female has a more rapid click rate [81 ms mean interclick interval (ICI)] than the ticking call of an unreceptive female (219 ms ICI). Rapping stimulates male advertisement calling, whereas ticking suppresses an already calling male. We examined how males label and discriminate female click rates. A labeling boundary experiment revealed that males perceive click rates between the means of rapping and ticking as lying on a continuum. They respond to 98 and 160 ms ICI as though to rapping and ticking, respectively. However, calling evoked by a click rate equally common to both calls (120 ms ICI) did not differ from the response to either rapping or ticking. A second experiment evaluated whether males discriminate click rates both labeled as ticking (180 and 219 ms ICI). Ticking suppresses advertising males, and suppressed males habituate (resume calling) to prolonged ticking. Both ticking stimuli suppressed males with equal effectiveness, and males habituated in equivalent amounts of time. When the stimulus was switched during habituation, no dishabituation occurred. We conclude that male labeling of click trains as rapping or ticking reflects an ambiguity resulting from the overlap in ICIs naturally occurring in the calls. Males do not respond differentially to click rates within the ticking category. Males thus combine discriminating and non-discriminating strategies in responding to the salient feature of female calls.

Citing Articles

Playback of broadband vocalizations of female mice suppresses male ultrasonic calls.

Hood K, Long E, Navarro E, Hurley L PLoS One. 2023; 18(1):e0273742.

PMID: 36603000 PMC: 9815654. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0273742.


Reciprocal Matched Filtering in the Inner Ear of the African Clawed Frog (Xenopus laevis).

Cobo-Cuan A, Narins P J Assoc Res Otolaryngol. 2020; 21(1):33-42.

PMID: 31907715 PMC: 7062955. DOI: 10.1007/s10162-019-00740-4.


Generation, Coordination, and Evolution of Neural Circuits for Vocal Communication.

Kelley D, Ballagh I, Barkan C, Bendesky A, Elliott T, Evans B J Neurosci. 2020; 40(1):22-36.

PMID: 31896561 PMC: 6939475. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0736-19.2019.


Auditory perception exhibits sexual dimorphism and left telencephalic dominance in .

Fan Y, Yue X, Xue F, Cui J, Brauth S, Tang Y Biol Open. 2018; 7(12).

PMID: 30509903 PMC: 6310876. DOI: 10.1242/bio.035956.


Probing forebrain to hindbrain circuit functions in Xenopus.

Kelley D, Elliott T, Evans B, Hall I, Leininger E, Rhodes H Genesis. 2017; 55(1-2).

PMID: 28095617 PMC: 5321079. DOI: 10.1002/dvg.22999.


References
1.
Liberman A, Harris K, Hoffman H, Griffith B . The discrimination of speech sounds within and across phoneme boundaries. J Exp Psychol. 1957; 54(5):358-68. DOI: 10.1037/h0044417. View

2.
Braaten R, Hulse S . Perceptual organization of auditory temporal patterns in European starlings (Sturnus vulgaris). Percept Psychophys. 1993; 54(5):567-78. DOI: 10.3758/bf03211781. View

3.
Gerhardt H . Discrimination of intermediate sounds in a synthetic call continuum by female green tree frogs. Science. 1978; 199(4333):1089-91. DOI: 10.1126/science.628833. View

4.
Tobias M, Kelley D . Vocalizations by a sexually dimorphic isolated larynx: peripheral constraints on behavioral expression. J Neurosci. 1987; 7(10):3191-7. PMC: 3493245. View

5.
Vignal C, Kelley D . Significance of temporal and spectral acoustic cues for sexual recognition in Xenopus laevis. Proc Biol Sci. 2007; 274(1609):479-88. PMC: 1766379. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2006.3744. View