» Articles » PMID: 17686870

Fusion Induced by a Class II Viral Fusion Protein, Semliki Forest Virus E1, is Dependent on the Voltage of the Target Cell

Overview
Journal J Virol
Date 2007 Aug 10
PMID 17686870
Citations 8
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Cells expressing the low pH-triggered class II viral fusion protein E1 of Semliki Forest virus (SFV) were fused to target cells. Fusion was monitored by electrical capacitance and aqueous dye measurements. Electrical voltage-clamp measurements showed that SFV E1-induced cell-cell fusion occurred quickly after acidification for a trans-negative potential across the target membrane (i.e., negative potential inside the target cell) but that a trans-positive potential eliminated all fusion. Use of an ionophore to control potentials for a large population of cells confirmed the dependence of fusion on voltage polarity. In contrast, fusion induced by the class I fusion proteins of human immunodeficiency virus, avian sarcoma leukosis virus, and influenza virus was independent of the voltage polarity across the target cell. Initial pore size and pore growth were also independent of voltage polarity for the class I proteins. An intermediate of SFV E1-induced fusion was created by transient acidification at low temperature. Membranes were hemifused at this intermediate state, and raising the temperature at neutral pH allowed full fusion to occur. Capacitance measurements showed that maintaining a trans-positive potential definitely blocked fusion at steps following the creation of the hemifusion intermediate and may have inhibited fusion at prior steps. It is proposed that the trans-negative voltage across the endosomal membrane facilitates fusion after low-pH-induced conformational changes of SFV E1 have occurred.

Citing Articles

Ginkgolic acid inhibits fusion of enveloped viruses.

Borenstein R, Hanson B, Markosyan R, Gallo E, Narasipura S, Bhutta M Sci Rep. 2020; 10(1):4746.

PMID: 32179788 PMC: 7075884. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-61700-0.


The transmembrane domain and acidic lipid flip-flop regulates voltage-dependent fusion mediated by class II and III viral proteins.

Markosyan R, Cohen F PLoS One. 2013; 8(10):e76174.

PMID: 24124539 PMC: 3790697. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0076174.


Hepatitis C virus is primed by CD81 protein for low pH-dependent fusion.

Sharma N, Mateu G, Dreux M, Grakoui A, Cosset F, Melikyan G J Biol Chem. 2011; 286(35):30361-30376.

PMID: 21737455 PMC: 3162395. DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M111.263350.


Alphavirus Entry and Membrane Fusion.

Kielian M, Chanel-Vos C, Liao M Viruses. 2011; 2(4):796-825.

PMID: 21546978 PMC: 3086016. DOI: 10.3390/v2040796.


Negative potentials across biological membranes promote fusion by class II and class III viral proteins.

Markosyan R, Cohen F Mol Biol Cell. 2010; 21(12):2001-12.

PMID: 20427575 PMC: 2883944. DOI: 10.1091/mbc.e09-10-0904.


References
1.
Bressanelli S, Stiasny K, Allison S, Stura E, Duquerroy S, Lescar J . Structure of a flavivirus envelope glycoprotein in its low-pH-induced membrane fusion conformation. EMBO J. 2004; 23(4):728-38. PMC: 380989. DOI: 10.1038/sj.emboj.7600064. View

2.
Rey F, Heinz F, Mandl C, Kunz C, Harrison S . The envelope glycoprotein from tick-borne encephalitis virus at 2 A resolution. Nature. 1995; 375(6529):291-8. DOI: 10.1038/375291a0. View

3.
Melikyan G, Barnard R, Markosyan R, Young J, Cohen F . Low pH is required for avian sarcoma and leukosis virus Env-induced hemifusion and fusion pore formation but not for pore growth. J Virol. 2004; 78(7):3753-62. PMC: 371058. DOI: 10.1128/jvi.78.7.3753-3762.2004. View

4.
Kielian M, Klimjack M, Ghosh S, Duffus W . Mechanisms of mutations inhibiting fusion and infection by Semliki Forest virus. J Cell Biol. 1996; 134(4):863-72. PMC: 2120960. DOI: 10.1083/jcb.134.4.863. View

5.
Melikyan G, Brener S, Ok D, Cohen F . Inner but not outer membrane leaflets control the transition from glycosylphosphatidylinositol-anchored influenza hemagglutinin-induced hemifusion to full fusion. J Cell Biol. 1997; 136(5):995-1005. PMC: 2132481. DOI: 10.1083/jcb.136.5.995. View