» Articles » PMID: 17683303

Ontario Doctors' Attitudes Toward and Use of Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology

Overview
Date 2007 Aug 9
PMID 17683303
Citations 13
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Clinical practice guidelines are intended to improve patient care and outcomes. Controversy exists about the utility of guidelines and doctors' attitudes toward them. The purpose of the survey was to determine Ontario doctors' attitudes toward practice guidelines in general, awareness of, and attitudes about, Cancer Care Ontario's Practice Guideline Initiative and the evidence-based guidelines it produces, self-reported use of guidelines and, factors related to guideline use.

Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional, self-administered postal survey of 1034 Ontario doctors who treat cancer. Main outcome measures were attitudes toward practice guidelines in general, attitudes towards those developed by Cancer Care Ontario's Practice Guideline Initiative, and self-reported use of practice guidelines.

Findings: A total of 520 doctors responded producing a 57% survey response rate. Ontario doctors are quite positive about practice guidelines in general and those developed by Cancer Care Ontario. Forty-four per cent reported using guidelines routinely or most of the time. Positive attitudes towards guidelines in general and the Ontario cancer guidelines specifically were related to more frequent reported use of guidelines. Other factors related to frequent reported use of guidelines included being a medical oncologist, treating gynaecological cancers and not other types of cancers.

Interpretation: Ontario doctors have positive attitudes toward practice guidelines and report frequent use of them. By understanding the relationship between doctors' perceptions of specific guidelines and their subsequent adherence to them, guideline developers will be better positioned to produce quality evidence-based guidelines that doctors will find acceptable, and therefore, be more predisposed to use.

Citing Articles

Clinician attitudes towards cancer treatment guidelines in Australia.

Bierbaum M, Arnolda G, Braithwaite J, Rapport F BMC Res Notes. 2023; 16(1):80.

PMID: 37194072 PMC: 10188226. DOI: 10.1186/s13104-023-06356-5.


Evaluation of the quality of published SCI clinical practice guidelines using the AGREE II instrument: Results from Can-SCIP expert panel.

Patsakos E, Craven B, Kua A, Cheng C, Eng J, Ho C J Spinal Cord Med. 2021; 44(sup1):S69-S78.

PMID: 34779735 PMC: 8604538. DOI: 10.1080/10790268.2021.1961053.


Clinicians' attitudes and perceived barriers and facilitators to cancer treatment clinical practice guideline adherence: a systematic review of qualitative and quantitative literature.

Bierbaum M, Rapport F, Arnolda G, Easpaig B, Lamprell K, Hutchinson K Implement Sci. 2020; 15(1):39.

PMID: 32460797 PMC: 7251711. DOI: 10.1186/s13012-020-00991-3.


Clinicians' attitudes to oncology clinical practice guidelines and the barriers and facilitators to adherence: a mixed methods study protocol.

Bierbaum M, Braithwaite J, Arnolda G, Delaney G, Liauw W, Kefford R BMJ Open. 2020; 10(3):e035448.

PMID: 32205377 PMC: 7103843. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-035448.


Breast medical oncologists' use of standard prognostic factors to predict a 21-gene recurrence score.

Kamal A, Loprinzi C, Reynolds C, Dueck A, Geiger X, Ingle J Oncologist. 2011; 16(10):1359-66.

PMID: 21934103 PMC: 3228065. DOI: 10.1634/theoncologist.2011-0048.