» Articles » PMID: 17681598

Reduced Foreign Body Response at Nitric Oxide-releasing Subcutaneous Implants

Overview
Journal Biomaterials
Date 2007 Aug 8
PMID 17681598
Citations 53
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The tissue response to nitric oxide (NO)-releasing subcutaneous implants is presented. Model implants were created by coating silicone elastomer with diazeniumdiolate-modified xerogel polymers capable of releasing NO. The host tissue response to such implants was evaluated at 1, 3, and 6 weeks and compared to that of uncoated silicone elastomer blanks and xerogel-coated controls incapable of releasing NO. Delivery of NO (approximately 1.35 micromol/cm2 of implant surface area) reduced foreign body collagen capsule ("scar tissue") thickness by >50% compared to uncoated silicone elastomer after 3 weeks. The chronic inflammatory response at the tissue/implant interface was also reduced by >30% at NO-releasing implants after 3 and 6 weeks. Additionally, CD-31 immunohistochemical staining revealed approximately 77% more blood vessels in proximity to NO-releasing implants after 1 week compared to controls. These findings suggest that conferring NO release to subcutaneous implants may promote effective device integration into healthy vascularized tissue, diminish foreign body capsule formation, and improve the performance of indwelling medical devices that require constant mass transport of analytes (e.g., implantable sensors).

Citing Articles

Implantable Passive Sensors for Biomedical Applications.

Kassanos P, Hourdakis E Sensors (Basel). 2025; 25(1.

PMID: 39796923 PMC: 11723123. DOI: 10.3390/s25010133.


Foreign Body Reaction to Ion-Beam-Treated Polyurethane Implant.

Chudinov V, Shardakov I, Litvinov V, Solodnikov S, Chudinova E, Kondyurina I Materials (Basel). 2024; 17(15).

PMID: 39124497 PMC: 11313228. DOI: 10.3390/ma17153833.


Engineered collagen polymeric materials create noninflammatory regenerative microenvironments that avoid classical foreign body responses.

Morrison R, Brookes S, Puls T, Cox A, Gao H, Liu Y Biomater Sci. 2023; 11(9):3278-3296.

PMID: 36942875 PMC: 10152923. DOI: 10.1039/d3bm00091e.


Mechanisms of Foreign Body Response Mitigation by Nitric Oxide Release.

Taylor J, Malone-Povolny M, Merricks E, Wimsey L, Soliman D, Nichols T Int J Mol Sci. 2022; 23(19).

PMID: 36232937 PMC: 9569454. DOI: 10.3390/ijms231911635.


Opportunities for Nitric Oxide in Potentiating Cancer Immunotherapy.

Kim J, Thomas S Pharmacol Rev. 2022; 74(4):1146-1175.

PMID: 36180108 PMC: 9553106. DOI: 10.1124/pharmrev.121.000500.


References
1.
Frost M, Reynolds M, Meyerhoff M . Polymers incorporating nitric oxide releasing/generating substances for improved biocompatibility of blood-contacting medical devices. Biomaterials. 2004; 26(14):1685-93. DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.06.006. View

2.
Silva E, Mooney D . Spatiotemporal control of vascular endothelial growth factor delivery from injectable hydrogels enhances angiogenesis. J Thromb Haemost. 2007; 5(3):590-8. DOI: 10.1111/j.1538-7836.2007.02386.x. View

3.
Ogino T, Arai T . Pharmacokinetic interactions of flunixin meglumine and enrofloxacin in ICR mice. Exp Anim. 2007; 56(2):79-84. DOI: 10.1538/expanim.56.79. View

4.
Bezuidenhout D, Davies N, Zilla P . Effect of well defined dodecahedral porosity on inflammation and angiogenesis. ASAIO J. 2002; 48(5):465-71. DOI: 10.1097/00002480-200209000-00004. View

5.
Wilson G, Hu Y . Enzyme-based biosensors for in vivo measurements. Chem Rev. 2001; 100(7):2693-704. DOI: 10.1021/cr990003y. View