» Articles » PMID: 17681057

Long-term Results of Permanent Metallic Stent Implantation in the Treatment of Benign Upper Urinary Tract Occlusion

Overview
Journal Int J Urol
Specialty Urology
Date 2007 Aug 8
PMID 17681057
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Aim: The management of complicated benign upper urinary tract occlusion is extremely challenging, especially in patients unable to undergo an open operative procedure. We report the long-term results of a permanent metallic stent for benign upper urinary tract occlusion.

Methods: From October 1995 to December 1998, 13 patients (8 men and 5 women, with a mean age of 43 years) with benign upper tract occlusion have been treated by metallic stent implantation. All patients had a nephrostomy tube to relieve the obstruction and the average time of the nephrostomy tube stay was 27 months, ranging from 3 to 131 months. The average length of occlusion was 2.7 cm, ranging from 1 to 3.6 cm. Ultrasonography, urography, diuresis renography and urine culture were performed every 3 months after stent insertion. Ureteroscopy was done when needed.

Results: The mean follow-up was 92 months (12-132 months). Ureteral patency was achieved in six patients and assisted patency with a Double-J stent was achieved in three patients. In two patients the kidney had to be removed because of progressive malfunction and in two patients the metal stent had to be extracted with the Holmium: YAG laser, burning it down due to the uncontrollable pyonephrosis. In three patients the ipsilateral flank pain recurred. One of these patients experienced urine leakage due to the initial nephrostomy tract: a ureteroscopy revealed a complete hyperplastic urothelial response. Proximal stone formations were found in 2 patients and all were removed by percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL). No stent migration or fragmentation was observed.

Conclusion: The implantation of metal stent is a safe and effective treatment for benign upper urinary tract occlusion, and has satisfying long-term outcome in selected cases. A further investigation is needed for its impact on the urodynamics of upper urinary tract.

Citing Articles

REVIEW ON COMPLICATIONS AND ADVERSE EFFECTS OF METALLIC URINARY STENTS.

Rako D, de Graaf P, Soria F Acta Clin Croat. 2024; 62(Suppl2):114-122.

PMID: 38966022 PMC: 11221226. DOI: 10.20471/acc.2023.62.s2.16.


Minimally invasive treatment of ureterovaginal fistula: A review and report of a new technique.

Al Otaibi K, Barakat A, El Darawany H, Sheikh A, Fadaak K, Al Sowayan O Arab J Urol. 2015; 10(4):414-7.

PMID: 26558060 PMC: 4442914. DOI: 10.1016/j.aju.2012.04.001.


Update on ureteral stent technology.

Lange D, Chew B Ther Adv Urol. 2011; 1(3):143-8.

PMID: 21789062 PMC: 3126057. DOI: 10.1177/1756287209341306.


Clinical experience with ureteral metal stents.

Al Aown A, Iason K, Panagiotis K, Liatsikos E Indian J Urol. 2011; 26(4):474-9.

PMID: 21369375 PMC: 3034051. DOI: 10.4103/0970-1591.74432.