Cranial Shape and Size Variation in Human Evolution: Structural and Functional Perspectives

Overview

Journal Childs Nerv Syst

Specialty Pediatrics

Date 2007 Aug 8

PMID 17680251

Citations 17

Authors

Emiliano Bruner

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

A GLIMPSE INTO MODERN PALEOANTHROPOLOGY: In the last decades, paleoanthropology has been deeply modified, changing from a descriptive and historical science to a more quantitative and analytical discipline. The covariation of multiple traits is investigated to study the evolutionary changes of the underlying anatomical models, mostly through the introduction of digital biomedical imaging procedures and of computed geometrical analyses supported by multivariate statistics. FUNCTIONAL CRANIOLOGY: The evolution of the human cranium is consequently considered in terms of functional and structural relationships between its components, largely influenced by the allometric variations associated with the increase in the relative cranial capacity. In the human genus, the changes in the face, base, and neurocranium are characterised by a mosaic variation, in which adaptations, secondary consequences, and stochastic factors concur to generate a set of anatomical possibilities and constraints. SYSTEMIC PERSPECTIVES TO THE EVOLUTION OF THE HUMAN CRANIAL MORPHOLOGY: Concepts like morphological modularity, anatomical integration, and heterochrony represent key issues in the development of the current human evolutionary studies.

Citing Articles

Sex determination based on features of the craniofacial bones in a sample of the central Chinese population using cone beam computed tomography.

Zhang W, Wu S, Li S, Wang H, Deng M, Ren L Forensic Sci Res. 2025; 10(1):owae009.

PMID: 39990698 PMC: 11843097. DOI: 10.1093/fsr/owae009.

Bioclimatic and masticatory influences on human cranial diversity verified by analysis of 3D morphometric homologous models.

Matsumura H, Friess M, Kouchi M, Tanijiri T, Stringer C, Garcia G Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):26663.

PMID: 39496664 PMC: 11535542. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-76715-0.

Global patterns of the cranial form of modern human populations described by analysis of a 3D surface homologous model.

Matsumura H, Tanijiri T, Kouchi M, Hanihara T, Friess M, Moiseyev V Sci Rep. 2022; 12(1):13826.

PMID: 35970916 PMC: 9378707. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-15883-3.

Dental Anomalies' Characteristics.

Sella Tunis T, Sarne O, Hershkovitz I, Finkelstein T, Pavlidi A, Shapira Y Diagnostics (Basel). 2021; 11(7).

PMID: 34202064 PMC: 8304734. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics11071161.

The Intertwined Evolution and Development of Sutures and Cranial Morphology.

White H, Goswami A, Tucker A Front Cell Dev Biol. 2021; 9:653579.

PMID: 33842480 PMC: 8033035. DOI: 10.3389/fcell.2021.653579.

References

Stedman H, Kozyak B, Nelson A, Thesier D, Su L, Low D . Myosin gene mutation correlates with anatomical changes in the human lineage. Nature. 2004; 428(6981):415-8. DOI: 10.1038/nature02358. View

Bastir M, Rosas A, Kuroe K . Petrosal orientation and mandibular ramus breadth: evidence for an integrated petroso-mandibular developmental unit. Am J Phys Anthropol. 2004; 123(4):340-50. DOI: 10.1002/ajpa.10313. View

Ponce de Leon M, Zollikofer C . Neanderthal cranial ontogeny and its implications for late hominid diversity. Nature. 2001; 412(6846):534-8. DOI: 10.1038/35087573. View

Bruner E, Mantini S, Perna A, Maffei C, Manzi G . Fractal dimension of the middle meningeal vessels: variation and evolution in Homo erectus, Neanderthals, and modern humans. Eur J Morphol. 2006; 42(4-5):217-24. DOI: 10.1080/09243860600746833. View

Semendeferi K, Damasio H, Frank R, Van Hoesen G . The evolution of the frontal lobes: a volumetric analysis based on three-dimensional reconstructions of magnetic resonance scans of human and ape brains. J Hum Evol. 1997; 32(4):375-88. DOI: 10.1006/jhev.1996.0099. View

Richtsmeier J, DeLeon V, Lele S . The promise of geometric morphometrics. Am J Phys Anthropol. 2003; Suppl 35:63-91. DOI: 10.1002/ajpa.10174. View

Klingenberg C . Morphometrics and the role of the phenotype in studies of the evolution of developmental mechanisms. Gene. 2002; 287(1-2):3-10. DOI: 10.1016/s0378-1119(01)00867-8. View

Spoor F, Zonneveld F . Morphometry of the primate bony labyrinth: a new method based on high-resolution computed tomography. J Anat. 1995; 186 ( Pt 2):271-86. PMC: 1167185. View

Aldridge K, Marsh J, Govier D, Richtsmeier J . Central nervous system phenotypes in craniosynostosis. J Anat. 2002; 201(1):31-9. PMC: 1570892. DOI: 10.1046/j.1469-7580.2002.00074.x. View

10.

Seidler H, Falk D, Stringer C, Wilfing H, Muller G, zur Nedden D . A comparative study of stereolithographically modelled skulls of Petralona and Broken Hill: implications for future studies of middle Pleistocene hominid evolution. J Hum Evol. 1998; 33(6):691-703. DOI: 10.1006/jhev.1997.0163. View

11.

Hjalgrim H, Lynnerup N, Liversage M, ROSENKLINT A . Stereolithography: potential applications in anthropological studies. Am J Phys Anthropol. 1995; 97(3):329-33. DOI: 10.1002/ajpa.1330970307. View

12.

Mafart B, Guipert G, de Lumley M, Subsol G . Three-dimensional computer imaging of hominid fossils: a new step in human evolution studies. Can Assoc Radiol J. 2004; 55(4):264-70. View

13.

Spoor F, Jeffery N, Zonneveld F . Using diagnostic radiology in human evolutionary studies. J Anat. 2000; 197 ( Pt 1):61-76. PMC: 1468108. DOI: 10.1046/j.1469-7580.2000.19710061.x. View

14.

Richtsmeier J, Aldridge K, DeLeon V, Panchal J, Kane A, Marsh J . Phenotypic integration of neurocranium and brain. J Exp Zool B Mol Dev Evol. 2006; 306(4):360-78. PMC: 2752667. DOI: 10.1002/jez.b.21092. View

15.

Anton S, Jaslow C, Swartz S . Sutural complexity in artificially deformed human (Homo sapiens) crania. J Morphol. 1992; 214(3):321-32. DOI: 10.1002/jmor.1052140307. View

16.

Bruner E, Manzi G, Arsuaga J . Encephalization and allometric trajectories in the genus Homo: evidence from the Neandertal and modern lineages. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003; 100(26):15335-40. PMC: 307568. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2536671100. View

17.

Bruner E, Saracino B, Ricci F, Tafuri M, Passarello P, Manzi G . Midsagittal cranial shape variation in the genus Homo by geometric morphometrics. Coll Antropol. 2005; 28(1):99-112. View

18.

Bookstein F, Gunz P, Mitteroecker P, Prossinger H, Schaefer K, Seidler H . Cranial integration in Homo: singular warps analysis of the midsagittal plane in ontogeny and evolution. J Hum Evol. 2003; 44(2):167-87. DOI: 10.1016/s0047-2484(02)00201-4. View

19.

Wood B, Collard M . The human genus. Science. 1999; 284(5411):65-71. DOI: 10.1126/science.284.5411.65. View

20.

ENLOW D . A comparative study of facial growth in Homo and Macaca. Am J Phys Anthropol. 1966; 24(3):293-308. DOI: 10.1002/ajpa.1330240303. View