» Articles » PMID: 17672655

Companding to Improve Cochlear-implant Speech Recognition in Speech-shaped Noise

Overview
Journal J Acoust Soc Am
Date 2007 Aug 4
PMID 17672655
Citations 7
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Nonlinear sensory and neural processing mechanisms have been exploited to enhance spectral contrast for improvement of speech understanding in noise. The "companding" algorithm employs both two-tone suppression and adaptive gain mechanisms to achieve spectral enhancement. This study implemented a 50-channel companding strategy and evaluated its efficiency as a front-end noise suppression technique in cochlear implants. The key parameters were identified and evaluated to optimize the companding performance. Both normal-hearing (NH) listeners and cochlear-implant (CI) users performed phoneme and sentence recognition tests in quiet and in steady-state speech-shaped noise. Data from the NH listeners showed that for noise conditions, the implemented strategy improved vowel perception but not consonant and sentence perception. However, the CI users showed significant improvements in both phoneme and sentence perception in noise. Maximum average improvement for vowel recognition was 21.3 percentage points (p<0.05) at 0 dB signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), followed by 17.7 percentage points (p<0.05) at 5 dB SNR for sentence recognition and 12.1 percentage points (p<0.05) at 5 dB SNR for consonant recognition. While the observed results could be attributed to the enhanced spectral contrast, it is likely that the corresponding temporal changes caused by companding also played a significant role and should be addressed by future studies.

Citing Articles

Audibility emphasis of low-level sounds improves consonant identification while preserving vowel identification for cochlear implant users.

Goldsworthy R, Bissmeyer S, Swaminathan J Speech Commun. 2022; 137:52-59.

PMID: 35937542 PMC: 9351334. DOI: 10.1016/j.specom.2022.01.001.


The effects of Lombard perturbation on speech intelligibility in noise for normal hearing and cochlear implant listeners.

Saba J, Hansen J J Acoust Soc Am. 2022; 151(2):1007.

PMID: 35232065 PMC: 8849642. DOI: 10.1121/10.0009377.


Forward-Masked Frequency Selectivity Improvements in Simulated and Actual Cochlear Implant Users Using a Preprocessing Algorithm.

Langner F, Jurgens T Trends Hear. 2016; 20.

PMID: 27604785 PMC: 5017570. DOI: 10.1177/2331216516659632.


Variations in the slope of the psychometric functions for speech intelligibility: a systematic survey.

Macpherson A, Akeroyd M Trends Hear. 2014; 18.

PMID: 24906905 PMC: 4227668. DOI: 10.1177/2331216514537722.


Signal-processing strategy for restoration of cross-channel suppression in hearing-impaired listeners.

Rasetshwane D, Gorga M, Neely S IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2013; 61(1):64-75.

PMID: 23925364 PMC: 3909721. DOI: 10.1109/TBME.2013.2276351.