» Articles » PMID: 17660186

Epoetin Delta in the Management of Renal Anaemia: Results of a 6-month Study

Overview
Date 2007 Jul 31
PMID 17660186
Citations 7
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Epoetin delta is an epoetin that, unlike existing agents, is produced in a human cell line. The present study investigated the efficacy and tolerability of intravenous (i.v.) epoetin delta compared with i.v. epoetin alfa.

Methods: This was a 6-month, multicentre, randomized, double-blind trial in haemodialysis patients previously receiving epoetin alfa. Haematological parameters were assessed, and adverse events monitored. Equivalent efficacy was defined as a difference in mean haemoglobin between the two agents over weeks 12-24 of < or = 1 g/dl with a 90% confidence interval (CI) within the range -1 to 1 g/dl.

Results: In total, 560 patients received epoetin delta while 192 received epoetin alfa, and 76.8% and 79.7% of patients, respectively, completed the study. Both agents showed similar efficacy in controlling anaemia: the point estimate for the difference in mean haemoglobin over weeks 12-24 was 0.01 g/dl (90% CI, -0.13, 0.15 g/dl), confirming equivalence. Adverse events were those expected in dialysis patients. Events possibly related to treatment occurred in 9.2% of patients receiving epoetin delta and 8.4% receiving epoetin alfa. Serious adverse events (SAEs) occurred in 33.0% and 26.7% of patients in the epoetin delta and epoetin alfa groups, respectively. Six patients in the epoetin delta group experienced an SAE considered possibly related to treatment (mostly access-related clotting), compared with no patient in the epoetin delta group. None of these SAEs were life threatening.

Conclusions: Epoetin delta was shown to have an equivalent efficacy and safety profile to epoetin alfa in this 6-month study.

Citing Articles

Erythropoiesis-stimulating agents for anaemia in adults with chronic kidney disease: a network meta-analysis.

Chung E, Palmer S, Saglimbene V, Craig J, Tonelli M, Strippoli G Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023; 2:CD010590.

PMID: 36791280 PMC: 9924302. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD010590.pub3.


Comparative effectiveness and safety of erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (biosimilars vs originators) in clinical practice: a population-based cohort study in Italy.

Trotta F, Belleudi V, Fusco D, Amato L, Mecozzi A, Mayer F BMJ Open. 2017; 7(3):e011637.

PMID: 28283484 PMC: 5353346. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011637.


Erythropoiesis-stimulating agents for anaemia in adults with chronic kidney disease: a network meta-analysis.

Palmer S, Saglimbene V, Mavridis D, Salanti G, Craig J, Tonelli M Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014; (12):CD010590.

PMID: 25486075 PMC: 6885065. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD010590.pub2.


Frequency of administration of erythropoiesis-stimulating agents for the anaemia of end-stage kidney disease in dialysis patients.

Hahn D, Cody J, Hodson E Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014; (5):CD003895.

PMID: 24872328 PMC: 8756398. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD003895.pub3.


Diagnosis and treatment of primary myelodysplastic syndromes in adults: recommendations from the European LeukemiaNet.

Malcovati L, Hellstrom-Lindberg E, Bowen D, Ades L, cermak J, Del Canizo C Blood. 2013; 122(17):2943-64.

PMID: 23980065 PMC: 3811170. DOI: 10.1182/blood-2013-03-492884.