» Articles » PMID: 17649909

A Statistical Analysis of Brain Morphology Using Wild Bootstrapping

Overview
Date 2007 Jul 26
PMID 17649909
Citations 23
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Methods for the analysis of brain morphology, including voxel-based morphology and surface-based morphometries, have been used to detect associations between brain structure and covariates of interest, such as diagnosis, severity of disease, age, IQ, and genotype. The statistical analysis of morphometric measures usually involves two statistical procedures: 1) invoking a statistical model at each voxel (or point) on the surface of the brain or brain subregion, followed by mapping test statistics (e.g., t test) or their associated p values at each of those voxels; 2) correction for the multiple statistical tests conducted across all voxels on the surface of the brain region under investigation. We propose the use of new statistical methods for each of these procedures. We first use a heteroscedastic linear model to test the associations between the morphological measures at each voxel on the surface of the specified subregion (e.g., cortical or subcortical surfaces) and the covariates of interest. Moreover, we develop a robust test procedure that is based on a resampling method, called wild bootstrapping. This procedure assesses the statistical significance of the associations between a measure of given brain structure and the covariates of interest. The value of this robust test procedure lies in its computationally simplicity and in its applicability to a wide range of imaging data, including data from both anatomical and functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). Simulation studies demonstrate that this robust test procedure can accurately control the family-wise error rate. We demonstrate the application of this robust test procedure to the detection of statistically significant differences in the morphology of the hippocampus over time across gender groups in a large sample of healthy subjects.

Citing Articles

Functional hybrid factor regression model for handling heterogeneity in imaging studies.

Huang C, Zhu H Biometrika. 2022; 109(4):1133-1148.

PMID: 36531154 PMC: 9754099. DOI: 10.1093/biomet/asac007.


Brain amyloid burden, sleep, and 24-hour rest/activity rhythms: screening findings from the Anti-Amyloid Treatment in Asymptomatic Alzheimer's and Longitudinal Evaluation of Amyloid Risk and Neurodegeneration Studies.

Spira A, Zipunnikov V, Raman R, Choi J, Di J, Bai J Sleep Adv. 2021; 2(1):zpab015.

PMID: 34661109 PMC: 8519157. DOI: 10.1093/sleepadvances/zpab015.


Brain Development in School-Age and Adolescent Girls: Effects of Turner Syndrome, Estrogen Therapy, and Genomic Imprinting.

ODonoghue S, Green T, Ross J, Hallmayer J, Lin X, Jo B Biol Psychiatry. 2019; 87(2):113-122.

PMID: 31561860 PMC: 6925344. DOI: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2019.07.032.


Multivariate pattern analysis of the neural correlates of smoking cue attentional bias.

Elton A, Chanon V, Boettiger C Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 2019; 180:1-10.

PMID: 30844426 PMC: 6529249. DOI: 10.1016/j.pbb.2019.03.001.


A web-based system for neural network based classification in temporomandibular joint osteoarthritis.

De Dumast P, Mirabel C, Cevidanes L, Ruellas A, Yatabe M, Ioshida M Comput Med Imaging Graph. 2018; 67:45-54.

PMID: 29753964 PMC: 5987251. DOI: 10.1016/j.compmedimag.2018.04.009.


References
1.
Styner M, Lieberman J, McClure R, Weinberger D, Jones D, Gerig G . Morphometric analysis of lateral ventricles in schizophrenia and healthy controls regarding genetic and disease-specific factors. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005; 102(13):4872-7. PMC: 555727. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0501117102. View

2.
Davatzikos C . Why voxel-based morphometric analysis should be used with great caution when characterizing group differences. Neuroimage. 2004; 23(1):17-20. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.05.010. View

3.
Thompson P, Cannon T, Narr K, van Erp T, Poutanen V, Huttunen M . Genetic influences on brain structure. Nat Neurosci. 2001; 4(12):1253-8. DOI: 10.1038/nn758. View

4.
Plomin R, Kosslyn S . Genes, brain and cognition. Nat Neurosci. 2001; 4(12):1153-4. DOI: 10.1038/nn1201-1153. View

5.
Thompson P, Woods R, Mega M, Toga A . Mathematical/computational challenges in creating deformable and probabilistic atlases of the human brain. Hum Brain Mapp. 2000; 9(2):81-92. PMC: 6871833. DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0193(200002)9:2<81::aid-hbm3>3.0.co;2-8. View