» Articles » PMID: 17643607

Quality of Life Before and After Major Lung Resection for Lung Cancer: a Prospective Follow-up Analysis

Overview
Journal Ann Thorac Surg
Publisher Elsevier
Date 2007 Jul 24
PMID 17643607
Citations 45
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: The objective of this study was to assess the preoperative and postoperative quality of life of candidates for major lung resection with lung cancer.

Methods: In all, 156 consecutive patients (144 lobectomies, 12 pneumonectomies) were prospectively assessed by means of the Short Form-36 Health Survey, version 2, preoperatively and 1 month and 3 months after operation. Serial quality of life scales were compared by repeated measures analysis of variance.

Results: In our series, most quality of life values were reduced compared with the general population. Compared with preoperative values, the physical composite scale was significantly reduced at 1 month (51 versus 45.1, p < 0.0001), and completely recovered at 3 months (51 versus 52.4, p = 0.2), whereas the mental composite scale remained unchanged. All correlation coefficients between these values and forced expiratory volume in 1 second, carbon monoxide lung diffusion capacity, and height reached at stair-climbing test at each evaluation period were below 0.2. With the exception of pneumonectomy patients (who had a significantly lower physical composite scale [p = 0.04]), no significant differences in both physical and mental values were noted in other high-risk subgroups of patients (elderly, coronary artery disease, poor pulmonary function) compared with lower-risk counterparts.

Conclusions: Candidates for lung resection with lung cancer had a worse preoperative quality of life compared with the general population. Quality-of-life measures had poor correlation with forced expiratory volume in 1 second, carbon monoxide lung diffusion capacity, and exercise test performance. Therefore, these functional variables cannot substitute for specific evaluation instruments. Finally, patients traditionally considered at higher risk for lung resection had postoperative physical and emotional quality of life scores similar to those observed in younger and fitter patients.

Citing Articles

Comparing Quality of Life and Psychological Changes in Benign and Malignant Lung Resections.

Nicola A, Adelina M, Porosnicu T, Oancea C, Marc M, Barata P Healthcare (Basel). 2025; 13(1.

PMID: 39791613 PMC: 11719650. DOI: 10.3390/healthcare13010006.


Evaluating optimal rehabilitation strategies in ICU: study protocol for a multicentre cohort study to assess Physical Activity dosing, Muscle mass, and physICal outcomeS (IPAMICS study).

Morita Y, Watanabe S, Nakanishi N, Tampo A, Ishii K, Suzuki K Ann Clin Epidemiol. 2024; 6(4):97-105.

PMID: 39726798 PMC: 11668687. DOI: 10.37737/ace.24014.


Is Spirometry a Sufficient Test for Assessing Respiratory Function after Lung Resection?.

Wnuk D, Marjanski T, Tomasik B, Zuralska-Wnuk J, Rzyman W Curr Oncol. 2024; 31(7):3985-3993.

PMID: 39057167 PMC: 11275653. DOI: 10.3390/curroncol31070295.


Applying ICF Framework to Explore the Factors That Influence Quality of Life in Patients After Lung Surgery.

Li X, Chen Y, Liu S, Zhang M Ann Rehabil Med. 2024; 48(2):155-162.

PMID: 38685573 PMC: 11058363. DOI: 10.5535/arm.23109.


Perioperative Evaluation of the Physical Quality of Life of Patients with Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Prospective Study.

Fukai R, Nishida T, Sugimoto H, Hibino M, Horiuchi S, Kondo T Cancers (Basel). 2024; 16(8).

PMID: 38672609 PMC: 11048487. DOI: 10.3390/cancers16081527.