» Articles » PMID: 1763168

Symptom-positively and -negatively Worded Items in Two Popular Self-report Inventories of Anxiety and Depression

Overview
Journal Psychol Rep
Specialties Psychiatry
Psychology
Date 1991 Oct 1
PMID 1763168
Citations 5
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Substantially higher mean scores on symptom-negatively versus symptom-positively worded items have consistently been reported in the literature for the balanced State-Trait Anxiety Inventory. In this study we aimed to replicate and extend these findings to Dutch trait versions of the inventory and Zung's similarly balanced Self-rating Depression Scale. Analysis indicated significantly higher mean subscale scores for symptom-negative as opposed to symptom-positive items of both measures, across sexes and age groups as well as across different levels of distress in nonclinical (n = 863), subclinical (n = 450), and clinical subject samples (n = 96). Sex and age differences were mainly confirmed to symptom-positive subscales. Scale intercorrelations were lowest between symptom-positively and symptom-negatively worded scales both within and across measures. Factor analyzing the combined measures identified a symptom-negative and a symptom-positive factor, tentatively labeled "absence of positive affect" and "presence of negative affect." Several explanations of the findings among which item-intensity specificity, the response style of social desirability, and the trait model of positive and negative affectivity are discussed.

Citing Articles

Factor structure and longitudinal measurement invariance of Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale during the whole perinatal period: a multicenter cohort study in China.

Yang J, Jiang Y, Qu Y, Zhan Y, Ma H, Li X BMC Public Health. 2025; 25(1):182.

PMID: 39819591 PMC: 11740660. DOI: 10.1186/s12889-024-21213-1.


The 18-item Swedish version of Ryff's psychological wellbeing scale: psychometric properties based on classical test theory and item response theory.

Garcia D, Kazemitabar M, Habibi Asgarabad M Front Psychol. 2023; 14:1208300.

PMID: 37854148 PMC: 10580072. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1208300.


Why are Optimists Optimistic?.

Sohl S, Moyer A, Lukin K, Knapp-Oliver S Individ Differ Res. 2012; 9(1):1-11.

PMID: 23239937 PMC: 3519290.


The Everyday Feeling Questionnaire: the structure and validation of a measure of general psychological well-being and distress.

Uher R, Goodman R Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2009; 45(3):413-23.

PMID: 19466369 DOI: 10.1007/s00127-009-0074-9.


Psychometric evaluation and predictive validity of Ryff's psychological well-being items in a UK birth cohort sample of women.

Abbott R, Ploubidis G, Huppert F, Kuh D, Wadsworth M, Croudace T Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2006; 4:76.

PMID: 17020614 PMC: 1634744. DOI: 10.1186/1477-7525-4-76.