Assessment of a Bovine Co-culture, Scaffold-free Method for Growing Meniscus-shaped Constructs
Overview
Affiliations
Using a self-assembly (SA), scaffoldless method, five high-density co-cultures with varied ratios of meniscal fibrochondrocytes (MFCs) and articular chondrocytes (ACs) were seeded into novel meniscus-specific, ring-shaped agarose wells. The following ratios of MFCs to ACs were used: 0% MFC, 25% MFC, 50% MFC, 75% MFC, and 100% MFC. Over 4 weeks, all ratios of cells self-assembled into three-dimensional constructs with varying mechanobiological and morphological properties. All groups stained for collagen II (Col II), and all groups except the 0% MFC group stained for collagen I (Col I). It was found that the tensile modulus was proportional to the percentage of MFCs employed. The 100% MFC group yielded the greatest mechanical stiffness with 432.2 +/- 47 kPa tensile modulus and an ultimate tensile strength of 23.7 +/- 2.4 kPa. On gross inspection, the 50% MFC constructs were the most similar to our idealized meniscus shape, our primary criterion. A second experiment was performed to examine the anisotropy of constructs as well as to directly compare the scaffoldless, SA method with a poly-glycolic acid (PGA) scaffold-based construct. When compared to PGA constructs, the SA groups were 2-4 times stiffer and stronger in tension. Further, at 8 weeks, SA groups exhibited circumferential fiber bundles similar to native tissue. When pulled in the circumferential direction, the SA group had significantly higher tensile modulus (226 +/- 76 kPa) than when pulled in the radial direction (67 +/- 32 kPa). The PGA constructs had neither a directional collagen fiber orientation nor differences in mechanical properties in the radial or circumferential direction. It is suggested that the geometric constraint imposed by the ring-shaped, nonadhesive mold guides collagen fibril directionality and, thus, alters mechanical properties. Co-culturing ACs and MFCs in this manner appears to be a promising new method for tissue engineering fibrocartilaginous tissues exhibiting a spectrum of mechanical and biomechanical properties.
Mesenchymal Stem Cells From Different Sources in Meniscus Repair and Regeneration.
Ding G, Du J, Hu X, Ao Y Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2022; 10:796367.
PMID: 35573249 PMC: 9091333. DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2022.796367.
Methodology to Quantify Collagen Subtypes and Crosslinks: Application in Minipig Cartilages.
Bielajew B, Hu J, Athanasiou K Cartilage. 2021; 13(2_suppl):1742S-1754S.
PMID: 34823380 PMC: 8804780. DOI: 10.1177/19476035211060508.
Szojka A, Moore C, Liang Y, Andrews S, Kunze M, Mulet-Sierra A PLoS One. 2021; 16(3):e0248292.
PMID: 33690647 PMC: 7946300. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0248292.
Gonzalez-Leon E, Bielajew B, Hu J, Athanasiou K Acta Biomater. 2020; 109:73-81.
PMID: 32344175 PMC: 7987216. DOI: 10.1016/j.actbio.2020.04.019.
Considerations for translation of tissue engineered fibrocartilage from bench to bedside.
Donahue R, Gonzalez-Leon E, Hu J, Athanasiou K J Biomech Eng. 2018; .
PMID: 30516244 PMC: 6611470. DOI: 10.1115/1.4042201.