» Articles » PMID: 17617195

Effects of Interpregnancy Interval and Outcome of the Preceding Pregnancy on Pregnancy Outcomes in Matlab, Bangladesh

Overview
Journal BJOG
Date 2007 Jul 10
PMID 17617195
Citations 118
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: To estimate the effects on pregnancy outcomes of the duration of the preceding interpregnancy interval (IPI) and type of pregnancy outcome that began the interval.

Design: Observational population-based study.

Setting: The Maternal Child Health-Family Planning (MCH-FP) area of Matlab, Bangladesh.

Population: A total of 66,759 pregnancy outcomes that occurred between 1982 and 2002.

Methods: Bivariate tabulations and multinomial logistic regression analysis.

Main Outcome Measures: Pregnancy outcomes (live birth, stillbirth, miscarriage [spontaneous fetal loss prior to 28 weeks], and induced abortion).

Results: When socio-economic and demographic covariates are controlled, of the IPIs that began with a live birth, those < 6 months in duration were associated with a 7.5-fold increase in the odds of an induced abortion (95% CI 6.0-9.4), a 3.3-fold increase in the odds of a miscarriage (95% CI 2.8-3.9), and a 1.6-fold increase in the odds of a stillbirth (95% CI 1.2-2.1) compared with 27- to 50-month IPIs. IPIs of 6-14 months were associated with increased odds of induced abortion (2.0, 95% CI 1.5-2.6). IPIs > or = 75 months were associated with increased odds of all three types of non-live-birth (NLB) outcomes but were not as risky as very short intervals. IPIs that began with a NLB were generally more likely to end with the same type of NLB.

Conclusions: Women whose pregnancies are between 15 and 75 months after a preceding pregnancy outcome (regardless of its type) have a lower likelihood of fetal loss than those with shorter or longer IPIs. Those with a preceding NLB outcome deserve special attention in counselling and monitoring.

Citing Articles

Pooled prevalence and multilevel determinants of stillbirths in sub-Saharan African countries: implications for achieving sustainable development goal.

Terefe B, Jembere M, Abrha N, Asgedom D, Assefa S, Assimamaw N Glob Health Res Policy. 2025; 10(1):11.

PMID: 40016816 PMC: 11866572. DOI: 10.1186/s41256-024-00395-6.


Under-five mortality and its associated factors in sub-Saharan Africa: a multilevel analysis of recent demographic and health surveys data based on Bayesian approach.

Birhanie A, Tessema Z, Endalew B, Tamirat K BMC Pediatr. 2025; 25(1):103.

PMID: 39923019 PMC: 11806815. DOI: 10.1186/s12887-025-05454-6.


Uncovering women's healthcare access challenges in low- and middle-income countries using mixed effects modelling approach: Insights for achieving the Sustainable Development Goals.

Terefe B, Workneh B, Zeleke G, Mekonen E, Zegeye A, Aemro A PLoS One. 2025; 20(1):e0314309.

PMID: 39820848 PMC: 11737728. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0314309.


Postpartum family planning counselling during maternity care visits in Bangladesh and its effect on contraceptive initiation.

Haider M, Rahman M, Khan S, Efa T, Rahman M J Glob Health. 2024; 14:04246.

PMID: 39700387 PMC: 11658713. DOI: 10.7189/jogh.14.04246.


Factors associated with time to first birth interval among ever married Bangladeshi women: A comparative analysis on Cox-PH model and parametric models.

Setu S, Kabir R, Islam M, Alauddin S, Nahar M PLOS Glob Public Health. 2024; 4(12):e0004062.

PMID: 39693329 PMC: 11654928. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0004062.


References
1.
Leridon H . Facts and artifacts in the study of intra-uterine mortality: A reconsideration from pregnancy histories. Popul Stud (Camb). 2011; 30(2):319-35. DOI: 10.1080/00324728.1976.10412738. View

2.
George L, Granath F, Johansson A, Olander B, Cnattingius S . Risks of repeated miscarriage. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2006; 20(2):119-26. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-3016.2006.00703.x. View

3.
Abebe G, Yohannis A . Birth interval and pregnancy outcome. East Afr Med J. 1996; 73(8):552-5. View

4.
Khoshnood B, Lee K, Wall S, Hsieh H, Mittendorf R . Short interpregnancy intervals and the risk of adverse birth outcomes among five racial/ethnic groups in the United States. Am J Epidemiol. 1998; 148(8):798-805. DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a009701. View

5.
Conde-Agudelo A, Belizan J, Breman R, Brockman S, Rosas-Bermudez A . Effect of the interpregnancy interval after an abortion on maternal and perinatal health in Latin America. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2005; 89 Suppl 1:S34-40. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2004.08.003. View