» Articles » PMID: 17615251

Spectral and Temporal Processing in Rat Posterior Auditory Cortex

Overview
Journal Cereb Cortex
Specialty Neurology
Date 2007 Jul 7
PMID 17615251
Citations 20
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The rat auditory cortex is divided anatomically into several areas, but little is known about the functional differences in information processing between these areas. To determine the filter properties of rat posterior auditory field (PAF) neurons, we compared neurophysiological responses to simple tones, frequency modulated (FM) sweeps, and amplitude modulated noise and tones with responses of primary auditory cortex (A1) neurons. PAF neurons have excitatory receptive fields that are on average 65% broader than A1 neurons. The broader receptive fields of PAF neurons result in responses to narrow and broadband inputs that are stronger than A1. In contrast to A1, we found little evidence for an orderly topographic gradient in PAF based on frequency. These neurons exhibit latencies that are twice as long as A1. In response to modulated tones and noise, PAF neurons adapt to repeated stimuli at significantly slower rates. Unlike A1, neurons in PAF rarely exhibit facilitation to rapidly repeated sounds. Neurons in PAF do not exhibit strong selectivity for rate or direction of narrowband one octave FM sweeps. These results indicate that PAF, like nonprimary visual fields, processes sensory information on larger spectral and longer temporal scales than primary cortex.

Citing Articles

Parietal Cortex Is Required for the Integration of Acoustic Evidence.

Yao J, Gimoto J, Constantinople C, Sanes D Curr Biol. 2020; 30(17):3293-3303.e4.

PMID: 32619478 PMC: 7483995. DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2020.06.017.


Auditory steady-state responses in primary and non-primary regions of the auditory cortex in neonatal ventral hippocampal lesion rats.

Li S, Ma L, Wang Y, Wang X, Li Y, Qin L PLoS One. 2018; 13(2):e0192103.

PMID: 29415081 PMC: 5802918. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0192103.


Topographic Distribution of Stimulus-Specific Adaptation across Auditory Cortical Fields in the Anesthetized Rat.

Nieto-Diego J, Malmierca M PLoS Biol. 2016; 14(3):e1002397.

PMID: 26950883 PMC: 4780834. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1002397.


Speech training alters consonant and vowel responses in multiple auditory cortex fields.

Engineer C, Rahebi K, Buell E, Fink M, Kilgard M Behav Brain Res. 2015; 287:256-64.

PMID: 25827927 PMC: 4424170. DOI: 10.1016/j.bbr.2015.03.044.


Speech sound processing deficits and training-induced neural plasticity in rats with dyslexia gene knockdown.

Centanni T, Chen F, Booker A, Engineer C, Sloan A, Rennaker R PLoS One. 2014; 9(5):e98439.

PMID: 24871331 PMC: 4037188. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0098439.


References
1.
Glazewski S . Experience-dependent changes in vibrissae evoked responses in the rodent barrel cortex. Acta Neurobiol Exp (Wars). 1999; 58(4):309-20. DOI: 10.55782/ane-1998-1287. View

2.
Lennie P . Single units and visual cortical organization. Perception. 1999; 27(8):889-935. DOI: 10.1068/p270889. View

3.
Sakai M, Kudoh M, SHIBUKI K . Long-lasting enhancement of sound discrimination ability after sound exposure in rats. Neurosci Res. 1999; 33(2):87-97. DOI: 10.1016/s0168-0102(98)00118-7. View

4.
Goodale M, Milner A . Separate visual pathways for perception and action. Trends Neurosci. 1992; 15(1):20-5. DOI: 10.1016/0166-2236(92)90344-8. View

5.
Langner G . Periodicity coding in the auditory system. Hear Res. 1992; 60(2):115-42. DOI: 10.1016/0378-5955(92)90015-f. View