Outcomes and Prognostic Factors of Cirrhotic Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma After Radical Major Hepatectomy

Background: Radical major hepatectomy (RMH) has been suggested as one of main options for cure of large/advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, its operative risk remains high and its effectiveness is still controversial, especially for patients with liver cirrhosis. The present study aims to investigate short- and long-term outcomes and to identify prognostic factors for cirrhotic patients with HCC after RMH.

Materials And Methods: Prospectively collected clinicopathological data of 81 consecutive cirrhotic HCC patients who underwent RMH were reviewed retrospectively. The Kaplan-Meier method was adopted for evaluating long-term survival. Prognostic factors were identified by univariate and multivariate analyses.

Results: After RMH, perioperative mortality, overall morbidity, and life-threatening morbidity were 1.2%, 24.7%, and 12.3%, respectively. Overall and disease-free 5-year survival rates were 39.4% and 28.1%, respectively. Univariate analysis showed that presence of portal vein tumor thrombosis (PVTT) and satellite nodules, late TNM staging, high Edmondson-Steiner grading, and blood transfusion was associated with worsened prognosis. Of them, Edmondson-Steiner grading was identified as the sole independent prognostic factor for both overall and disease-free survival by multivariate analysis, whereas blood transfusion and the presence of PVTT independently predicted unfavorable overall or disease-free survival, respectively.

Conclusions: These data indicated that RMH was safe and appeared to be effective in treating cirrhotic patients with HCC. Some tumor-related and clinical variables influenced long-term outcome of these patients after RMH.