» Articles » PMID: 17604301

Accuracy of Reading Liquid Based Cytology Slides Using the ThinPrep Imager Compared with Conventional Cytology: Prospective Study

Overview
Journal BMJ
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2007 Jul 3
PMID 17604301
Citations 29
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: To compare the accuracy of liquid based cytology using the computerised ThinPrep Imager with that of manually read conventional cytology.

Design: Prospective study.

Setting: Pathology laboratory in Sydney, Australia.

Participants: 55,164 split sample pairs (liquid based sample collected after conventional sample from one collection) from consecutive samples of women choosing both types of cytology and whose specimens were examined between August 2004 and June 2005.

Main Outcome Measures: Primary outcome was accuracy of slides for detecting squamous lesions. Secondary outcomes were rate of unsatisfactory slides, distribution of squamous cytological classifications, and accuracy of detecting glandular lesions.

Results: Fewer unsatisfactory slides were found for imager read cytology than for conventional cytology (1.8% v 3.1%; P<0.001). More slides were classified as abnormal by imager read cytology (7.4% v 6.0% overall and 2.8% v 2.2% for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia of grade 1 or higher). Among 550 patients in whom imager read cytology was cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 1 or higher and conventional cytology was less severe than grade 1, 133 of 380 biopsy samples taken were high grade histology. Among 294 patients in whom imager read cytology was less severe than cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 1 and conventional cytology was grade 1 or higher, 62 of 210 biopsy samples taken were high grade histology. Imager read cytology therefore detected 71 more cases of high grade histology than did conventional cytology, resulting from 170 more biopsies. Similar results were found when one pathologist reread the slides, masked to cytology results.

Conclusion: The ThinPrep Imager detects 1.29 more cases of histological high grade squamous disease per 1000 women screened than conventional cytology, with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 1 as the threshold for referral to colposcopy. More imager read slides than conventional slides were satisfactory for examination and more contained low grade cytological abnormalities.

Citing Articles

Cost-effectiveness of artificial intelligence-assisted liquid-based cytology testing for cervical cancer screening in China.

Shen M, Zou Z, Bao H, Fairley C, Canfell K, Ong J Lancet Reg Health West Pac. 2023; 34:100726.

PMID: 37283979 PMC: 10240360. DOI: 10.1016/j.lanwpc.2023.100726.


Accurate deep learning model using semi-supervised learning and Noisy Student for cervical cancer screening in low magnification images.

Kurita Y, Meguro S, Tsuyama N, Kosugi I, Enomoto Y, Kawasaki H PLoS One. 2023; 18(5):e0285996.

PMID: 37200281 PMC: 10194854. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0285996.


ThinPrep® imaging system-assisted vs manual screening of urinary cytology slides in the detection of the "suspicious for high-grade urothelial carcinoma" category.

Piaton E, Prat J, Nennig C, Hutin K, Colombel M, Ruffion A Cytopathology. 2022; 33(6):716-724.

PMID: 36004492 PMC: 9826506. DOI: 10.1111/cyt.13173.


Efficacy of careHPV™ human papillomavirus screening versus conventional cytology tests for the detection of precancerous and cancerous cervical lesions among women living with HIV-1 in Lao People's Democratic Republic.

Paboriboune P, Phongsavan K, Arounlangsy P, Flaissier B, Aphayarath O, Phimmasone P Cancer Med. 2022; 11(9):1984-1994.

PMID: 35257506 PMC: 9089224. DOI: 10.1002/cam4.4502.


The artificial intelligence-assisted cytology diagnostic system in large-scale cervical cancer screening: A population-based cohort study of 0.7 million women.

Bao H, Sun X, Zhang Y, Pang B, Li H, Zhou L Cancer Med. 2020; 9(18):6896-6906.

PMID: 32697872 PMC: 7520355. DOI: 10.1002/cam4.3296.


References
1.
Ferris D, Heidemann N, Litaker M, Crosby J, Macfee M . The efficacy of liquid-based cervical cytology using direct-to-vial sample collection. J Fam Pract. 2000; 49(11):1005-11. View

2.
Bergeron C, Bishop J, Lemarie A, Cas F, Ayivi J, Huynh B . Accuracy of thin-layer cytology in patients undergoing cervical cone biopsy. Acta Cytol. 2001; 45(4):519-24. DOI: 10.1159/000327858. View

3.
Irwig L, Macaskill P, Farnsworth A, Wright R, McCool J, Barratt A . A randomized crossover trial of PAPNET for primary cervical screening. J Clin Epidemiol. 2004; 57(1):75-81. DOI: 10.1016/S0895-4356(03)00259-2. View

4.
Wilbur D, Facik M, Rutkowski M, Mulford D, Atkison K . Clinical trials of the CytoRich specimen-preparation device for cervical cytology. Preliminary results. Acta Cytol. 1997; 41(1):24-9. DOI: 10.1159/000332300. View

5.
Laverty C, Farnsworth A, Thurloe J, Grieves A, Bowditch R . Evaluation of the CytoRich slide preparation process. Anal Quant Cytol Histol. 1997; 19(3):239-45. View