Testicular Microlithiasis: Prevalence and Risk of Concurrent and Interval Development of Testicular Tumor in a Referred Population
Overview
Affiliations
Aims: To identify prevalence of testicular microlithiasis on ultrasound in a referred population and risk of concurrent and interval testicular tumor development.
Methods: Retrospective review of our radiology database revealed 4363 scrotal ultrasounds were performed over a six-year period. Ultrasound findings were correlated with our hospital pathological database. The association of intratesticular microlithiasis and confirmed testicular cancers were assessed by means of a Fisher exact test.
Results: Testicular microlithiasis was identified in 32 of the 4259 patients (0.75% of screened population). In the same time period 83 testicular tumors were identified on initial scanning (2.00% of screened population). Three patients with tumor had coexisting microlithiasis (9.4% incidence), whilst a further two had interval development of tumor. The follow-up of the microlithiasis patients ranged from 3 to 72 months (mean 33.9 months, median 40 months).
Conclusions: Interval development of testicular tumor is a documented phenomenon. As the incidence in detection of microlithiasis increases secondary to advances in ultrasound technology, follow-up becomes financially prohibitive. We advocate regular self-examination as the primary follow-up of otherwise well patients with testicular microlithiasis.
Testicular microlithiasis and testicular tumor: a review of the literature.
Leblanc L, Lagrange F, Lecoanet P, Marcon B, Eschwege P, Hubert J Basic Clin Androl. 2018; 28:8.
PMID: 30002831 PMC: 6036676. DOI: 10.1186/s12610-018-0073-3.
Testicular microlithiasis: is there a need for surveillance in the absence of other risk factors?.
Richenberg J, Brejt N Eur Radiol. 2012; 22(11):2540-6.
PMID: 22710430 DOI: 10.1007/s00330-012-2520-4.