» Articles » PMID: 17600270

The $5 Man: the Underground Economic Response to a Large Cigarette Tax Increase in New York City

Overview
Specialty Public Health
Date 2007 Jun 30
PMID 17600270
Citations 23
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objectives: We examined the mechanisms by which living in a disadvantaged minority community influences smoking and illegal cigarette sale and purchasing behaviors after a large cigarette tax increase.

Methods: Data were collected from 14 focus groups (n=104) that were conducted during the spring of 2003 among Blacks aged 18 years and older living in New York City.

Results: A large tax increase led to what focus group participants described as a pervasive illegal cigarette market in a low-income minority community. Perceived pro-smoking community norms, a stressful social and economic environment, and the availability of illegal cigarettes worked together to reinforce smoking and undermine cessation.

Conclusions: Although interest in quitting was high, bootleggers created an environment in which reduced-price cigarettes were easier to access than cessation services. This activity continues to undermine the public health goals of the tax increase.

Citing Articles

Have higher cigarette taxes in the United States discouraged smoking? A review of data from 1999-2013.

Wamamili B, Garrow A Tob Prev Cessat. 2020; 3:15.

PMID: 32432189 PMC: 7232812. DOI: 10.18332/tpc/70561.


Why an FDA Ban on Menthol Is Likely to Survive a Tobacco Industry Lawsuit.

Schroth K, Villanti A, Kurti M, Delnevo C Public Health Rep. 2019; 134(3):300-306.

PMID: 30970219 PMC: 6505334. DOI: 10.1177/0033354919841011.


"I'm gonna get me a loosie" Understanding single cigarette purchases by adult smokers in a disadvantaged section of New York City.

von Lampe K, Kurti M, Johnson J Prev Med Rep. 2018; 12:182-185.

PMID: 30306015 PMC: 6174847. DOI: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2018.09.016.


Rapid Assessment for Establishing Evidence of an Underground Cigarette Market in Oakland Chinatown: A Dual Approach.

Wang-Schweig M, Lipperman-Kreda S, Lee J J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2018; 29(2):615-622.

PMID: 29805127 PMC: 6314805. DOI: 10.1353/hpu.2018.0045.


Cost-effectiveness of increasing the reach of smoking cessation interventions in Germany: results from the EQUIPTMOD.

Huber M, Prager M, Coyle K, Coyle D, Lester-George A, Trapero-Bertran M Addiction. 2017; 113 Suppl 1:52-64.

PMID: 29243347 PMC: 6033002. DOI: 10.1111/add.14062.


References
1.
FULLILOVE R, Fullilove M, Northridge M, Ganz M, Bassett M, McLean D . Risk factors for excess mortality in Harlem. Findings from the Harlem Household Survey. Am J Prev Med. 1999; 16(3 Suppl):22-8. DOI: 10.1016/s0749-3797(98)00146-9. View

2.
Pobutsky A, Pordell P, Yamashita B, Tomiyasu D, Nihoa W, Kitagawa K . Community based participatory approaches to address health disparities in Hawai'i: recent applications in cancer prevention, detection and treatment programs. Pac Health Dialog. 2005; 11(2):183-90. View

3.
Barbeau E, Krieger N, Soobader M . Working class matters: socioeconomic disadvantage, race/ethnicity, gender, and smoking in NHIS 2000. Am J Public Health. 2004; 94(2):269-78. PMC: 1448243. DOI: 10.2105/ajph.94.2.269. View

4.
Emery S, White M, Gilpin E, Pierce J . Was there significant tax evasion after the 1999 50 cent per pack cigarette tax increase in California?. Tob Control. 2002; 11(2):130-4. PMC: 1763842. DOI: 10.1136/tc.11.2.130. View

5.
Laws M, Whitman J, Bowser D, Krech L . Tobacco availability and point of sale marketing in demographically contrasting districts of Massachusetts. Tob Control. 2002; 11 Suppl 2():ii71-3. PMC: 1766074. DOI: 10.1136/tc.11.suppl_2.ii71. View