» Articles » PMID: 17598129

An Examination of the Influence of Patient Race and Ethnicity on Expressed Interest in Learning About Cancer Clinical Trials

Overview
Specialty Oncology
Date 2007 Jun 29
PMID 17598129
Citations 20
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: A number of factors have been identified as being associated with the documented low accrual rate of minorities into cancer-related clinical trials in the USA. An important issue is the fundamental interest, or lack thereof, of these specific patient populations in actually considering study participation.

Methods: To examine this issue, aggregate data were analyzed from a proprietary Internet-based decision support program (NexProfiler Treatment Option Tools for Cancer, NexCura, Seattle, WA, USA) embedded into approximately 100 cancer-associated Web sites where responding patients (or their families) were asked, but not required, to identify their race/ethnicity (African-American, Asian-American, Caucasian and Hispanic) and to also respond to the question, "Are you interested in learning about clinical trials?".

Results: Of the > 60,000 patients who both self-identified their race/ethnicity and responded to the question regarding their desire to learn about clinical trials, approximately 10% were from the minority (non-Caucasian) groups. Of note, in all four malignancies analyzed (breast, colorectal, lung, and prostate) and in both patients < or = 60 and > 60 years of age, each of the three non-Caucasian populations expressed an interest in learning about such studies that was equal to, if not greater than, that observed in the Caucasian respondents.

Conclusion: Assuming these provocative results regarding self-declared desire to learn about clinical trials can be confirmed by others with similar Internet-associated databases, this analysis suggests Web-based recruitment strategies may be an effective method to communicate with minority populations in the US (and, perhaps, elsewhere) with a specific interest in considering participation in cancer clinical trials.

Citing Articles

Patient Advocates for Clinical Research (PACER): A Step Toward Ethical, Relevant, and Truly Participatory Clinical Research in India.

Bagai P, Sharma P, Ansari A, Singh N, Sharma S, Singh P Cureus. 2024; 16(4):e58454.

PMID: 38765448 PMC: 11100276. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.58454.


Email-Based Recruitment Into the Health eHeart Study: Cohort Analysis of Invited Eligible Patients.

Ng M, Olgin J, Marcus G, Lyles C, Pletcher M J Med Internet Res. 2023; 25:e51238.

PMID: 38133910 PMC: 10770794. DOI: 10.2196/51238.


Understanding organizational perspectives from clinical research stakeholders involved in recruitment for biopharmaceutical-sponsored clinical trials in the United States: Recommendations for organizational initiatives to improve access and....

Johnson R, DAbundo M, Cahill T, DeLuca D Contemp Clin Trials Commun. 2023; 33:101148.

PMID: 37313113 PMC: 10258233. DOI: 10.1016/j.conctc.2023.101148.


Investigation and analysis of Chinese publics cognition for clinical research.

Luo A, Liu J, Liu C, Xiang Y, Yang G, Huang Z Zhong Nan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2023; 48(1):130-137.

PMID: 36935186 PMC: 10930562. DOI: 10.11817/j.issn.1672-7347.2023.220242.


Factors affecting patient participation in clinical trials in Ireland: A narrative review.

Walsh E, Sheridan A Contemp Clin Trials Commun. 2018; 3:23-31.

PMID: 29736453 PMC: 5935836. DOI: 10.1016/j.conctc.2016.01.002.


References
1.
Advani A, Atkeson B, Brown C, Peterson B, Fish L, Johnson J . Barriers to the participation of African-American patients with cancer in clinical trials: a pilot study. Cancer. 2003; 97(6):1499-506. DOI: 10.1002/cncr.11213. View

2.
Sateren W, Trimble E, Abrams J, Brawley O, Breen N, Ford L . How sociodemographics, presence of oncology specialists, and hospital cancer programs affect accrual to cancer treatment trials. J Clin Oncol. 2002; 20(8):2109-17. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2002.08.056. View

3.
Murthy V, Krumholz H, Gross C . Participation in cancer clinical trials: race-, sex-, and age-based disparities. JAMA. 2004; 291(22):2720-6. DOI: 10.1001/jama.291.22.2720. View

4.
Elting L, Cooksley C, Bekele B, Frumovitz M, Avritscher E, Sun C . Generalizability of cancer clinical trial results: prognostic differences between participants and nonparticipants. Cancer. 2006; 106(11):2452-8. DOI: 10.1002/cncr.21907. View

5.
Mills E, Seely D, Rachlis B, Griffith L, Wu P, Wilson K . Barriers to participation in clinical trials of cancer: a meta-analysis and systematic review of patient-reported factors. Lancet Oncol. 2006; 7(2):141-8. DOI: 10.1016/S1470-2045(06)70576-9. View