Sagittal Lumbar Spine Position During Standing, Walking, and Running at Various Gradients
Overview
Affiliations
Context: Motion in the lumbar spine during certain physical activities may exceed tissue homeostasis, leading to low back pain. Previous authors have assessed sagittal motion of the lumbar spine during walking; however, limited attention has been focused on changes in spine position with walking or running on different surface gradients.
Objective: To investigate lumbar spine sagittal position during standing, walking, and running on level, uphill, and downhill surfaces.
Design: Three by three and 2 x 3 (activity by gradient) within-subjects design with repeated measures on both factors.
Setting: Motion analysis laboratory.
Patients Or Other Participants: Twenty healthy women (age = 23.4 +/- 2.2 years, height = 141.5 +/- 7.5 cm, mass = 60.5 +/- 5.9 kg) with no history of low back pain or surgery or lower extremity impairments or surgery.
Intervention(s): Subjects stood motionless, walked at 1.3 m/s, and ran at 2.9 m/s on a treadmill under 3 conditions: level, uphill at 5 degrees, and downhill at 5 degrees.
Main Outcome Measure(s): We measured lumbar spine position and total lumbar range of motion in the sagittal plane using an infrared motion analysis system, with markers affixed to the skin over the sacrum and thoracolumbar junction.
Results: The average lumbar spine position, for both walking and running, was smallest uphill and greatest downhill. On all 3 gradients, the sagittal range of motion (flexion-extension) was greater when running than when walking.
Conclusions: For each of the surface gradients, the average lumbar spine position was greatest during standing, at an intermediate value during running, and smallest during walking. Changes in lumbar spine position corresponding to different activities and different surface gradients are important considerations when rehabilitating patients with lumbar spine conditions.
Xu Y, Liu Q, Pang J, Zeng C, Ma X, Li P J Multidiscip Healthc. 2024; 17:5063-5078.
PMID: 39539514 PMC: 11559245. DOI: 10.2147/JMDH.S477452.
Functional analysis of postural spinal and pelvic parameters using static and dynamic spinometry.
Bode T, Zoroofchi S, Vettorazzi E, Droste J, Welsch G, Schwesig R Heliyon. 2024; 10(7):e29239.
PMID: 38633646 PMC: 11021985. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e29239.
Downhill running impairs peripheral but not central neuromuscular indices in elbow flexor muscles.
Ye X, Benton R, Miller W, Jeon S, Song J Sports Med Health Sci. 2022; 3(2):101-109.
PMID: 35782164 PMC: 9219267. DOI: 10.1016/j.smhs.2021.03.001.
Dynamic spinal posture and pelvic position analysis using a rasterstereographic device.
Michalik R, Hamm J, Quack V, Eschweiler J, Gatz M, Betsch M J Orthop Surg Res. 2020; 15(1):389.
PMID: 32900390 PMC: 7487646. DOI: 10.1186/s13018-020-01825-0.
Consmuller T, Rohlmann A, Weinland D, Druschel C, Duda G, Taylor W Eur Spine J. 2012; 21(11):2170-80.
PMID: 22543411 PMC: 3481097. DOI: 10.1007/s00586-012-2312-1.