Subclassification of Low Back Pain: a Cross-country Comparison

Overview

Journal Eur Spine J

Specialty Orthopedics

Date 2007 Jun 20

PMID 17576604

Citations 25

Authors

Evdokia V Billis

Christopher J McCarthy

Jacqueline A Oldham

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Various health professionals have attempted to classify low back pain (LBP) subgroups and have developed several LBP classification systems. Knowing that culture has an effect on LBP symptomatology, assessment findings and clinical decision making, the aim of this review is to perform a cross-country comparative review amongst the published classification systems, addressing each country's similarities and differences as well as exploring whether cultural factors have been incorporated into the subclassification process. A systematic search of databases limited to human adults was undertaken by Medline, Cinahl, AMED and PEDro databases between January 1980 and October 2005. Classification systems from nine countries were identified. Most studies were classified according to pathoanatomic and/or clinical features, whereas fewer studies utilized a psychosocial and even less, a biopsychosocial approach. Most studies were limited in use to the country of the system's developer. Very few studies addressed cultural issues, highlighting the lack of information on the impact of specific cultural factors on LBP classification procedures. However, there seem to be certain 'cultural trends' in classification systems within each country, which are discussed. Despite the plethora of classification studies, there is still no system which is internationally established, effective, reliable and valid. Future research should aim to develop a LBP classification system within a well identified cultural setting, addressing the multi-dimensional features of the LBP presentation.

Citing Articles

Reliability of the McKenzie Method of Mechanical Diagnosis and Therapy in the examination of spinal pain, including the OTHER classifications: Reliability of the McKenzie Method in spinal pain.

Van Helvoirt H, Tempelman H, van der Vet P, van der Vet F, van Helvoirt J, Rosedale R Braz J Phys Ther. 2024; 29(1):101154.

PMID: 39674061 PMC: 11699726. DOI: 10.1016/j.bjpt.2024.101154.

Back pain treatment: a new perspective.

Steinmetz A Ther Adv Musculoskelet Dis. 2022; 14:1759720X221100293.

PMID: 35814351 PMC: 9260567. DOI: 10.1177/1759720X221100293.

Non-Specific Low Back Pain and Lumbar Radiculopathy: Comparison of Morphologic and Compositional MRI as Assessed by gagCEST Imaging at 3T.

Frenken M, Nebelung S, Schleich C, Muller-Lutz A, Radke K, Kamp B Diagnostics (Basel). 2021; 11(3).

PMID: 33652924 PMC: 7996864. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics11030402.

Rehabilitation for Low Back Pain: A Narrative Review for Managing Pain and Improving Function in Acute and Chronic Conditions.

Pergolizzi Jr J, LeQuang J Pain Ther. 2020; 9(1):83-96.

PMID: 32006236 PMC: 7203283. DOI: 10.1007/s40122-020-00149-5.

Professional barriers and facilitators to using stratified care approaches for managing non-specific low back pain: a qualitative study with Canadian physiotherapists and chiropractors.

Al Zoubi F, French S, Patey A, Mayo N, Bussieres A Chiropr Man Therap. 2019; 27:68.

PMID: 31857892 PMC: 6909494. DOI: 10.1186/s12998-019-0286-3.

References

Riddle D . Classification and low back pain: a review of the literature and critical analysis of selected systems. Phys Ther. 1998; 78(7):708-37. DOI: 10.1093/ptj/78.7.708. View

Hicks G, Fritz J, Delitto A, McGill S . Preliminary development of a clinical prediction rule for determining which patients with low back pain will respond to a stabilization exercise program. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2005; 86(9):1753-62. DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2005.03.033. View

Tenhula J, Rose S, Delitto A . Association between direction of lateral lumbar shift, movement tests, and side of symptoms in patients with low back pain syndrome. Phys Ther. 1990; 70(8):480-6. DOI: 10.1093/ptj/70.8.480. View

Espeland A, Baerheim A . Factors affecting general practitioners' decisions about plain radiography for back pain: implications for classification of guideline barriers--a qualitative study. BMC Health Serv Res. 2003; 3(1):8. PMC: 153534. DOI: 10.1186/1472-6963-3-8. View

Werneke M, Hart D . Discriminant validity and relative precision for classifying patients with nonspecific neck and back pain by anatomic pain patterns. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2003; 28(2):161-6. DOI: 10.1097/00007632-200301150-00012. View

Keefe F, Bradley L, Crisson J . Behavioral assessment of low back pain: identification of pain behavior subgroups. Pain. 1990; 40(2):153-160. DOI: 10.1016/0304-3959(90)90066-M. View

George S, Delitto A . Clinical examination variables discriminate among treatment-based classification groups: a study of construct validity in patients with acute low back pain. Phys Ther. 2005; 85(4):306-14. View

Pincus T, Burton A, Vogel S, Field A . A systematic review of psychological factors as predictors of chronicity/disability in prospective cohorts of low back pain. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2002; 27(5):E109-20. DOI: 10.1097/00007632-200203010-00017. View

Leboeuf-Yde C, Lauritsen J, Lauritzen T . Why has the search for causes of low back pain largely been nonconclusive?. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1997; 22(8):877-81. DOI: 10.1097/00007632-199704150-00010. View

10.

Stiefel F, de Jonge P, Huyse F, Guex P, Slaets J, Lyons J . "INTERMED": a method to assess health service needs. II. Results on its validity and clinical use. Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 1999; 21(1):49-56. DOI: 10.1016/s0163-8343(98)00061-9. View

11.

Long A, Donelson R, Fung T . Does it matter which exercise? A randomized control trial of exercise for low back pain. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2004; 29(23):2593-602. DOI: 10.1097/01.brs.0000146464.23007.2a. View

12.

Goubert L, Crombez G, De Bourdeaudhuij I . Low back pain, disability and back pain myths in a community sample: prevalence and interrelationships. Eur J Pain. 2004; 8(4):385-94. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejpain.2003.11.004. View

13.

Maniadakis N, Gray A . The economic burden of back pain in the UK. Pain. 1999; 84(1):95-103. DOI: 10.1016/S0304-3959(99)00187-6. View

14.

Aceves-Avila F, Ferrari R, Ramos-Remus C . New insights into culture driven disorders. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2004; 18(2):155-71. DOI: 10.1016/j.berh.2004.02.004. View

15.

Kent P, Keating J . Classification in nonspecific low back pain: what methods do primary care clinicians currently use?. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2005; 30(12):1433-40. DOI: 10.1097/01.brs.0000166523.84016.4b. View

16.

Harper A, Harper D, Lambert L, Andrews H, Lo K, Ross M . Symptoms of impairment, disability and handicap in low back pain: a taxonomy. Pain. 1992; 50(2):189-195. DOI: 10.1016/0304-3959(92)90160-D. View

17.

Dunn K, Croft P . Classification of low back pain in primary care: using "bothersomeness" to identify the most severe cases. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2005; 30(16):1887-92. DOI: 10.1097/01.brs.0000173900.46863.02. View

18.

Ammendolia C, Bombardier C, Hogg-Johnson S, Glazier R . Views on radiography use for patients with acute low back pain among chiropractors in an Ontario community. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2002; 25(8):511-20. DOI: 10.1067/mmt.2002.127075. View

19.

Sikorski J . A rationalized approach to physiotherapy for low-back pain. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1985; 10(6):571-9. DOI: 10.1097/00007632-198507000-00012. View

20.

Newton W, Curtis P, Witt P, Hobler K . Prevalence of subtypes of low back pain in a defined population. J Fam Pract. 1997; 45(4):331-5. View