» Articles » PMID: 17576592

Differences Between Younger and Older Workers in the Need for Recovery After Work

Overview
Date 2007 Jun 20
PMID 17576592
Citations 39
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study was to test the hypothesis whether ageing workers have a higher need for recovery than younger workers.

Methods: 1100 subjects (84.3% participation rate) employed in the public sector participated in a cross-sectional questionnaire study. The subjects were divided into two age groups: older workers (> or =45 years) and younger workers (<45 years). The dependent outcome variable was assessed by "The Need for Recovery Scale" questionnaire. A need for recovery score higher than 45 was defined as a high need for recovery. A standardized questionnaire was used to assess psychosocial and physical work strain. Other occupational factors were included: part-time or full-time work, shift work and more than one employment. The following personal and social life and family related factors were also considered: gender, presence of chronic disease, degree of ability to cope with stress, number of children at home, taking care of disabled or elderly people, degree of satisfaction on family and social relationships. Stepwise multiple logistic regression analysis was used to examine the presence of a high need for recovery in older workers.

Results: The mean recovery score was significantly higher in the group of the older workers (40.9) as compared to the younger workers (33.6) (P < 0.005). In the final multivariate logistic regression model the older age group had a significantly higher risk for the presence of a high need for recovery versus the younger group (OR 1.56, 95%CI 1.15-2.11). Gender, presence of musculoskeletal disorder, work pressure, monotonous work, social support from superiors, full time work and unsatisfactory social contacts were also significantly associated with the need for recovery.

Conclusion: The hypothesis that ageing workers have a higher need for recovery than younger workers was confirmed.

Citing Articles

Physical working conditions over time: a repeated cross-sectional study in German employees.

Beller J, Grasshoff J, Safieddine B J Occup Med Toxicol. 2024; 19(1):24.

PMID: 38858744 PMC: 11165766. DOI: 10.1186/s12995-024-00423-8.


Factors associated with poor mental health during mandatory home work: a cross-sectional study in university staff.

Kiss P, De Meester M, Vingerhoets I, Garmyn B, Raemdonck A J Occup Med Toxicol. 2023; 18(1):14.

PMID: 37501195 PMC: 10375671. DOI: 10.1186/s12995-023-00382-6.


A narrative review of occupational scheduling that impacts fatigue and recovery relevant to veterinarian well-being.

Steffey M, Scharf V, Risselada M, Buote N, Griffon D, Winter A Can Vet J. 2023; 64(7):674-683.

PMID: 37397701 PMC: 10286151.


Health trajectories across the work exit transition in the 1990s, 2000s, and 2010s: the role of working conditions and policy.

van der Noordt M, van Tilburg T, van der Pas S, Wouterse B, Deeg D Arch Public Health. 2023; 81(1):16.

PMID: 36740687 PMC: 9901107. DOI: 10.1186/s13690-022-01008-9.


The Effectiveness of Blue-Light-Emitting Glasses in Security Guards Exposed to Night Shift Work on Work-Related and General Fatigue: A Randomised Controlled Cross-Over Study.

Helmhout P, Timmerman S, van Drongelen A, Bakker E Clocks Sleep. 2022; 4(4):675-687.

PMID: 36547102 PMC: 9777001. DOI: 10.3390/clockssleep4040051.


References
1.
Ursin H, Eriksen H . The cognitive activation theory of stress. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2004; 29(5):567-92. DOI: 10.1016/S0306-4530(03)00091-X. View

2.
Reilly T, Waterhouse J, Atkinson G . Aging, rhythms of physical performance, and adjustment to changes in the sleep-activity cycle. Occup Environ Med. 1998; 54(11):812-6. PMC: 1128953. DOI: 10.1136/oem.54.11.812. View

3.
Jansen N, Kant I, van Amelsvoort L, Nijhuis F, van den Brandt P . Need for recovery from work: evaluating short-term effects of working hours, patterns and schedules. Ergonomics. 2003; 46(7):664-80. DOI: 10.1080/0014013031000085662. View

4.
de Zwart B, Frings-Dresen M, van Dijk F . Physical workload and the aging worker: a review of the literature. Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 1995; 68(1):1-12. DOI: 10.1007/BF01831627. View

5.
. Aging and working capacity. Report of a WHO Study Group. World Health Organ Tech Rep Ser. 1993; 835:1-49. View