» Articles » PMID: 17573409

Evaluating the CSAPPA Subscales As Potential Screening Instruments for Developmental Coordination Disorder

Overview
Journal Arch Dis Child
Specialty Pediatrics
Date 2007 Jun 19
PMID 17573409
Citations 6
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: In this study, we assess the potential of three subscales of the Children's Self-Perceptions of Adequacy in and Predilection for Physical Activity (CSAPPA), a measure of generalised self-efficacy, as possible screens for developmental coordination disorder (DCD).

Design: We used the Bruininks-Oseretsky Test of Motor Proficiency short form (BOTMP-SF) to identify probable cases of DCD. We administered the BOTMP-SF and the CSAPPA to 590 children in grades 4-8 from four schools in the Niagara region of Ontario, Canada. We used receiver operator characteristic (ROC) analysis to assess and compare the performance of the subscales and the full instrument.

Results: The area under the receiving operating characteristic curve (AUC), a measure of the overall performance of the test against a diagnostic standard, was good for the full CSAPPA (AUC = 0.81, 95% CI 0.75 to 0.87). The adequacy (AUC = 0.79, 95% CI 0.73 to 0.85) and predilection (AUC = 0.80, 95% CI 0.74 to 0.87) subscales had performance statistically equivalent to the full scale. Since the adequacy subscale is shorter and has good content validity with respect to DCD, we ran additional analyses on this measure. A cut-point of 24 on this subscale gives a sensitivity of 0.86 (95% CI 0.76 to 0.97) and a specificity of 0.47 (95% CI 0.43 to 0.51).

Conclusion: The adequacy subscale of the CSAPPA appears to be equivalent to the full measure for the purposes of screening for DCD. Further research should explore the possibility of adding further criteria to improve the CSAPPA's modest specificity in this role.

Citing Articles

Activities of daily living, self-efficacy and motor skill related fitness and the interrelation in children with moderate and severe Developmental Coordination Disorder.

Farhat F, Denysschen M, Mezghani N, Kammoun M, Gharbi A, Rebai H PLoS One. 2024; 19(4):e0299646.

PMID: 38652708 PMC: 11037543. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0299646.


Evaluating the impact of movement tracking feedback on engagement with home exercise programmes of children with cerebral palsy using a new therapy app: a protocol for a mixed-methods single-case experimental design with alternating treatments.

Petrevska M, Wright F, Khan A, Munce S, Fehlings D, Biddiss E BMJ Open. 2024; 14(3):e082761.

PMID: 38503423 PMC: 10952875. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-082761.


Cumulative Prenatal Risk Factors and Developmental Coordination Disorder in Young Children.

Babij S, James M, Veldhuizen S, Rodriguez C, Price D, Kwan M Matern Child Health J. 2023; 28(2):267-273.

PMID: 37966560 DOI: 10.1007/s10995-023-03804-3.


Psychometric properties of observational tools for identifying motor difficulties - a systematic review.

Asunta P, Viholainen H, Ahonen T, Rintala P BMC Pediatr. 2019; 19(1):322.

PMID: 31493795 PMC: 6731620. DOI: 10.1186/s12887-019-1657-6.


.

Dev Med Child Neurol. 2019; 61(7):e1.

PMID: 31192464 PMC: 7839484. DOI: 10.1111/dmcn.14274.


References
1.
Visser J . Developmental coordination disorder: a review of research on subtypes and comorbidities. Hum Mov Sci. 2003; 22(4-5):479-93. DOI: 10.1016/j.humov.2003.09.005. View

2.
Fischer J, Bachmann L, Jaeschke R . A readers' guide to the interpretation of diagnostic test properties: clinical example of sepsis. Intensive Care Med. 2003; 29(7):1043-51. DOI: 10.1007/s00134-003-1761-8. View

3.
Hay J, Hawes R, Faught B . Evaluation of a screening instrument for developmental coordination disorder. J Adolesc Health. 2004; 34(4):308-13. DOI: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2003.07.004. View

4.
Crawford S, Wilson B, Dewey D . Identifying developmental coordination disorder: consistency between tests. Phys Occup Ther Pediatr. 2001; 20(2-3):29-50. View

5.
Missiuna C, Polatajko H . Developmental dyspraxia by any other name: are they all just clumsy children?. Am J Occup Ther. 1995; 49(7):619-27. DOI: 10.5014/ajot.49.7.619. View