» Articles » PMID: 17565125

Old Ways, New Means: Tobacco Industry Funding of Academic and Private Sector Scientists Since the Master Settlement Agreement

Overview
Journal Tob Control
Specialty Psychiatry
Date 2007 Jun 15
PMID 17565125
Citations 17
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

When, as a condition of the Master Settlement Agreement (MSA) in 1998, US tobacco companies disbanded the Council for Tobacco Research and the Center for Indoor Air Research, they lost a vital connection to scientists in academia and the private sector. The aim of this paper was to investigate two new research projects funded by US tobacco companies by analysis of internal tobacco industry documents now available at the University of California San Francisco (San Francisco, California, USA) Legacy tobacco documents library, other websites and the open scientific literature. Since the MSA, individual US tobacco companies have replaced their industry-wide collaborative granting organisations with new, individual research programmes. Philip Morris has funded a directed research project through the non-profit Life Sciences Research Office, and British American Tobacco and its US subsidiary Brown and Williamson have funded the non-profit Institute for Science and Health. Both of these organisations have downplayed or concealed their true level of involvement with the tobacco industry. Both organisations have key members with significant and long-standing financial relationships with the tobacco industry. Regulatory officials and policy makers need to be aware that the studies these groups publish may not be as independent as they seem.

Citing Articles

Big tobacco's dirty tricks: Seven key tactics of the tobacco industry.

Gannon J, Bach K, Cattaruzza M, Bar-Zeev Y, Forberger S, Kilibarda B Tob Prev Cessat. 2023; 9:39.

PMID: 38124801 PMC: 10731746. DOI: 10.18332/tpc/176336.


Influence of Disclosed and Undisclosed Funding Sources in Tobacco Harm Reduction Discourse: A Social Network Analysis.

Vassey J, Hendlin Y, Vora M, Ling P Nicotine Tob Res. 2022; 25(12):1829-1837.

PMID: 36308511 PMC: 10664076. DOI: 10.1093/ntr/ntac250.


Tobacco Industry Efforts to Respond to Smoke-Free Policies in Multi-Unit Housing: An Evaluation of Tobacco Industry Documents.

Miller J, Vijayaraghavan M Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022; 19(5).

PMID: 35270744 PMC: 8910764. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19053053.


The Influence of Industry Sponsorship on the Research Agenda: A Scoping Review.

Fabbri A, Lai A, Grundy Q, Bero L Am J Public Health. 2018; 108(11):e9-e16.

PMID: 30252531 PMC: 6187765. DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2018.304677.


Food industry sponsorship of academic research: investigating commercial bias in the research agenda.

Fabbri A, Holland T, Bero L Public Health Nutr. 2018; 21(18):3422-3430.

PMID: 30157979 PMC: 10260999. DOI: 10.1017/S1368980018002100.


References
1.
Cohen J, Ashley M, Ferrence R, Brewster J, Goldstein A . Institutional addiction to tobacco. Tob Control. 1999; 8(1):70-4. PMC: 1763926. DOI: 10.1136/tc.8.1.70. View

2.
Ong E, Glantz S . Tobacco industry efforts subverting International Agency for Research on Cancer's second-hand smoke study. Lancet. 2000; 355(9211):1253-9. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(00)02098-5. View

3.
Richter E, Friesenegger S, Engl J, Tricker A . Use of precision-cut tissue slices in organ culture to study metabolism of 4-(methylnitrosamino)-1-(3-pyridyl)-1-butanone (NNK) and 4-(methylnitrosamino)-1-(3-pyridyl)-1-butanol (NNAL) by hamster lung, liver and kidney. Toxicology. 2000; 144(1-3):83-91. DOI: 10.1016/s0300-483x(99)00193-6. View

4.
Malone R, Balbach E . Tobacco industry documents: treasure trove or quagmire?. Tob Control. 2000; 9(3):334-8. PMC: 1748361. DOI: 10.1136/tc.9.3.334. View

5.
Chapman S, Shatenstein S . The ethics of the cash register: taking tobacco research dollars. Tob Control. 2001; 10(1):1-2. PMC: 1763999. DOI: 10.1136/tc.10.1.1. View