Confidence Intervals for Gamma-family Measures of Ordinal Association
Overview
Authors
Affiliations
This research focused on confidence intervals (CIs) for 10 measures of monotonic association between ordinal variables. Standard errors (SEs) were also reviewed because more than 1 formula was available per index. For 5 indices, an element of the formula used to compute an SE is given that is apparently new. CIs computed with different SEs were compared in simulations with small samples (N = 25, 50, 75, or 100) for variables with 4 or 5 categories. With N > 25, many CIs performed well. Performance was best for consistent CIs due to N. Cliff and colleagues (N. Cliff, 1996; N. Cliff & V. Charlin, 1991; J. D. Long & N. Cliff, 1997). CIs for Spearman's rank correlation were also examined: Parameter coverage was erratic and sometimes egregiously underestimated.
Age-dependent Pavlovian biases influence motor decision-making.
Chen X, Rutledge R, Brown H, Dolan R, Bestmann S, Galea J PLoS Comput Biol. 2018; 14(7):e1006304.
PMID: 29979685 PMC: 6051643. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006304.
Reducing Bias and Error in the Correlation Coefficient Due to Nonnormality.
Bishara A, Hittner J Educ Psychol Meas. 2018; 75(5):785-804.
PMID: 29795841 PMC: 5965513. DOI: 10.1177/0013164414557639.
The fallacy of placing confidence in confidence intervals.
Morey R, Hoekstra R, Rouder J, Lee M, Wagenmakers E Psychon Bull Rev. 2015; 23(1):103-23.
PMID: 26450628 PMC: 4742505. DOI: 10.3758/s13423-015-0947-8.
Finley J, Benjamin A J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2011; 38(3):632-52.
PMID: 22103783 PMC: 3433232. DOI: 10.1037/a0026215.