» Articles » PMID: 17562902

The Ups and Downs of Peer Review

Abstract

This article traces the history of peer review of scientific publications, plotting the development of the process from its inception to its present-day application. We discuss the merits of peer review and its weaknesses, both perceived and real, as well as the practicalities of several major proposed changes to the system. It is our hope that readers will gain a better appreciation of the complexities of the process and, when serving as reviewers themselves, will do so in a manner that will enhance the utility of the exercise. We also propose the development of an international on-line training program for accreditation of potential referees.

Citing Articles

Reviewability and supportability: New complementary principles to empower research software practices.

Zhang H, Maillo A, Khan S, Martinez-de-Morentin X, Lehmann R, Gomez-Cabrero D Comput Struct Biotechnol J. 2024; 23:3989-3998.

PMID: 39582890 PMC: 11584522. DOI: 10.1016/j.csbj.2024.10.034.


Using an expert survey and user feedback to construct PRECHECK: A checklist to evaluate preprints on COVID-19 and beyond.

Turoman N, Heyard R, Schwab S, Furrer E, Vergauwe E, Held L F1000Res. 2024; 12:588.

PMID: 38983445 PMC: 11231630. DOI: 10.12688/f1000research.129814.3.


The Peer Review Process: Past, Present, and Future.

Drozdz J, Ladomery M Br J Biomed Sci. 2024; 81:12054.

PMID: 38952614 PMC: 11215012. DOI: 10.3389/bjbs.2024.12054.


Systematic review of conceptual criticisms of homeopathy.

Schulz V, Ucker A, Scherr C, Tournier A, Jager T, Baumgartner S Heliyon. 2023; 9(11):e21287.

PMID: 38074879 PMC: 10700388. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e21287.


Knowledge and motivations of training in peer review: An international cross-sectional survey.

Willis J, Ramos J, Cobey K, Ng J, Khan H, Albert M PLoS One. 2023; 18(7):e0287660.

PMID: 37436973 PMC: 10337866. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0287660.