» Articles » PMID: 17559654

Identification of QTL Controlling Meat Quality Traits in an F2 Cross Between Two Chicken Lines Selected for Either Low or High Growth Rate

Overview
Journal BMC Genomics
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialty Genetics
Date 2007 Jun 15
PMID 17559654
Citations 17
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Meat technological traits (i.e. meat pH, water retention and color) are important considerations for improving further processing of chicken meat. These quality traits were originally characterized in experimental lines selected for high (HG) and low (LG) growth. Presently, quantitative trait loci (QTL) for these traits were analyzed in an F2 population issued from the HG x LG cross. A total of 698 animals in 50 full-sib families were genotyped for 108 microsatellite markers covering 21 linkage groups.

Results: The HG and LG birds exhibit large differences in body weight and abdominal fat content. Several meat quality traits [pH at 15 min post-slaughter (pH15) and ultimate pH (pHu), breast color-redness (BCo-R) and breast color-yellowness (BCo-Y)] were lower in HG chickens. In contrast, meat color-lightness (BCo-L) was higher in HG chickens, whereas meat drip loss (DL) was similar in both lines. HG birds were more active on the shackle line. Association analyses were performed using maximum-likelihood interval mapping in QTLMAP. Five genome-wide significant QTLs were revealed: two for pH15 on GGA1 and GGA2, one for DL on GGA1, one for BCo-R and one for BCo-Y both on GGA11. In addition, four suggestive QTLs were identified by QTLMAP for BCo-Y, pHu, pH15 and DL on GGA1, GGA4, GGA12 and GGA14, respectively. The QTL effects, averaged on heterozygous families, ranged from 12 to 31% of the phenotypic variance. Further analyses with QTLExpress confirmed the two genome-wide QTLs for meat color on GGA11, failed to identify the genome-wide QTL for pH15 on GGA2, and revealed only suggestive QTLs for pH15 and DL on GGA1. However, QTLExpress qualified the QTL for pHu on GGA4 as genome-wide.

Conclusion: The present study identified genome-wide significant QTLs for all meat technological traits presently assessed in these chickens, except for meat lightness. This study highlights the effects of divergent selection for growth rate on some behavioral traits, muscle biochemistry and ultimately meat quality traits. Several QTL regions were identified that are worthy of further characterization. Some QTLs may in fact co-localize, suggesting pleiotropic effects for some chromosomal regions.

Citing Articles

Whole-genome variants dataset of 209 local chickens from China.

Tan X, Zhang J, Dong J, Huang M, Li Q, Wang H Sci Data. 2024; 11(1):169.

PMID: 38316816 PMC: 10844214. DOI: 10.1038/s41597-024-02995-w.


Glucose Tolerance and Plasma Non-Esterified Fatty Acid Levels in Chickens Selected for Low Body Weight, Red Junglefowl, and their Reciprocal Cross.

Sutherland D, Honaker C, Gilbert E, Andersson L, Siegel P J Poult Sci. 2020; 56(4):245-252.

PMID: 32055221 PMC: 7005393. DOI: 10.2141/jpsa.0180098.


Mapping of Quantitative Trait Loci for Growth and Carcass-Related Traits in Chickens Using a Restriction-Site Associated DNA Sequencing Method.

Ono T, Ohara K, Ishikawa A, Kouguchi T, Nagano A, Takenouchi A J Poult Sci. 2020; 56(3):166-176.

PMID: 32055211 PMC: 7005382. DOI: 10.2141/jpsa.0180066.


Genetical Genomics of Tonic Immobility in the Chicken.

Fogelholm J, Inkabi S, Hoglund A, Abbey-Lee R, Johnsson M, Jensen P Genes (Basel). 2019; 10(5).

PMID: 31067744 PMC: 6562468. DOI: 10.3390/genes10050341.


Transcriptional profiling and pathway analysis reveal differences in pituitary gland function, morphology, and vascularization in chickens genetically selected for high or low body weight.

Ellestad L, Cogburn L, Simon J, Le Bihan-Duval E, Aggrey S, Byerly M BMC Genomics. 2019; 20(1):316.

PMID: 31023219 PMC: 6482517. DOI: 10.1186/s12864-019-5670-9.


References
1.
Bihan-Duval E, Berri C, Baeza E, Millet N, Beaumont C . Estimation of the genetic parameters of meat characteristics and of their genetic correlations with growth and body composition in an experimental broiler line. Poult Sci. 2001; 80(7):839-43. DOI: 10.1093/ps/80.7.839. View

2.
Schmid M, Nanda I, Hoehn H, Schartl M, Haaf T, Buerstedde J . Second report on chicken genes and chromosomes 2005. Cytogenet Genome Res. 2005; 109(4):415-79. DOI: 10.1159/000084205. View

3.
Berri C, Wacrenier N, Millet N, Bihan-Duval E . Effect of selection for improved body composition on muscle and meat characteristics of broilers from experimental and commercial lines. Poult Sci. 2001; 80(7):833-8. DOI: 10.1093/ps/80.7.833. View

4.
Le Bihan-Duval E, Berri C, Baeza E, Sante V, Astruc T, Remignon H . Genetic parameters of meat technological quality traits in a grand-parental commercial line of turkey. Genet Sel Evol. 2003; 35(6):623-35. PMC: 2698002. DOI: 10.1186/1297-9686-35-7-623. View

5.
Abasht B, Dekkers J, Lamont S . Review of quantitative trait loci identified in the chicken. Poult Sci. 2006; 85(12):2079-96. DOI: 10.1093/ps/85.12.2079. View