» Articles » PMID: 17556304

Good Patient and Technique Survival in Elderly Patients on Continuous Ambulatory Peritoneal Dialysis

Overview
Journal Perit Dial Int
Publisher Sage Publications
Date 2007 Nov 22
PMID 17556304
Citations 26
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The aging population has significant implications for the community. The increasing number of elderly end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients presses the renal team to find an appropriate management plan. We used a retrospective analysis to study the effectiveness of continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) in elderly ESRD patients. Of the 328 CAPD patients recruited for the study, 121 were in the elderly group (>or=65 years of age), and 207 were in the control group (under 65 years of age). Median age in the elderly group was 71 years, and in the control group, 51 years. The elderly group had a higher prevalence (54.5%) of diabetes mellitus. The 2-year and 5-year rates of patient survival were 89.3% and 54.8% respectively in the elderly group and 92.2% and 62.9% in the control group (p=0.19). The 2-year and 5-year rates of technique survival were 84.0% and 45.7% respectively in the elderly group and 80.9% and 49.1% in the control group (p=0.75). The probability of a 12-month peritonitis-free period was 76.6% in the elderly group and 76.5% in the control group (p=0.75). One hundred elderly patients (82.6% of the group) performed their CAPD exchanges by themselves. We observed no significant difference in clinical outcome-including patient survival, technique survival, and peritonitis-free period-between the elderly self-care CAPD and the elderly assisted CAPD groups. In elderly ESRD patients, CAPD is an effective dialysis modality. A slightly longer training time is to be expected for elderly patients. Self-care CAPD for elderly patients who are capable of performing their own exchanges provides them with an independent home life.

Citing Articles

Outcomes of elderly peritoneal dialysis patients: 65-74 years old versus ≥ 75 years old.

Gao L, Chen X, Feng S, Lu Y, Song K, Shen H Ren Fail. 2023; 45(2):2264977.

PMID: 37795800 PMC: 10557534. DOI: 10.1080/0886022X.2023.2264977.


Microbiology and Outcome of Peritoneal Dialysis-Related Peritonitis in Elderly Patients: A Retrospective Study in China.

Song P, Yang D, Li J, Zhuo N, Fu X, Zhang L Front Med (Lausanne). 2022; 9:799110.

PMID: 35492330 PMC: 9046869. DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2022.799110.


Outcomes of peritoneal dialysis in elderly vs non-elderly patients: A systemic review and meta-analysis.

Jiang C, Zheng Q PLoS One. 2022; 17(2):e0263534.

PMID: 35134073 PMC: 8824377. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0263534.


Tackling Dialysis Burden around the World: A Global Challenge.

Kam-Tao Li P, Chan G, Chen J, Chen H, Cheng Y, Fan S Kidney Dis (Basel). 2021; 7(3):167-175.

PMID: 34179112 PMC: 8215964. DOI: 10.1159/000515541.


Interaction between central obesity and frailty on the clinical outcome of peritoneal dialysis patients.

Chan G, N G J, Chow K, Kwong V, Pang W, Cheng P PLoS One. 2020; 15(10):e0241242.

PMID: 33104712 PMC: 7588087. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0241242.