» Articles » PMID: 17551414

Changes in Sexual Behavior and STD Prevalence Among Heterosexual STD Clinic Attendees: 1993-1995 Versus 1999-2000

Overview
Journal Sex Transm Dis
Date 2007 Jun 7
PMID 17551414
Citations 25
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: To examine trends in sex behaviors and STD prevalence over time among heterosexual STD clinic populations from 3 urban STD clinics in the United States.

Study Design: Cross-sectional analysis comparing baseline data on risk (self-reported) and STDs (laboratory defined) from 2 randomized controlled trials evaluating counseling efficacy conducted about 5 years apart, Project RESPECT (1993-1995) and RESPECT-2 (1999-2000).

Results: The participants from RESPECT (n = 2457) and RESPECT-2 (n = 3080) were demographically similar. However, the proportion of participants reporting any unprotected anal sex was much higher in RESPECT-2 (women: 7% vs. 18%; men: 7% vs. 17%). Also, substantially more participants reported a new sex partner in RESPECT-2 (women: 43% vs. 61%; men: 54% vs. 72%). In addition, more women reported 2 or more partners (37% vs. 48%) and a partner with another concurrent sex partner (19% vs. 32%). Slightly more women and men in RESPECT-2 reported 2 protective behaviors, having an HIV test and any condom use; however, consistent condom use did not differ. Conversely, the proportion of participants with bacterial STDs (chlamydia, gonorrhea, or syphilis) was much lower in RESPECT-2 (women: 24% vs. 18%; men: 38% vs. 24%).

Conclusions: Despite substantial promotion of safer sex behaviors over the past decade, many risk behaviors were stable over time, and some behaviors, such as unprotected anal sex, appeared substantially higher. Even in the absence of widespread behavior change, the prevalence of common bacterial STDs appeared to have decreased appreciably.

Citing Articles

Changes in Oral and Anal Sex With Opposite-Sex Partners Among Sexually Active Females and Males Aged 15 to 44 Years in the United States: National Survey of Family Growth, 2011-2019.

Katz D, Copen C, Haderxhanaj L, Hogben M, Goodreau S, Spicknall I Sex Transm Dis. 2023; 50(11):713-719.

PMID: 37732840 PMC: 10581427. DOI: 10.1097/OLQ.0000000000001867.


Lifetime prevalence and correlates of female condom use for anal sex in a geographically diverse sample of Men who have sex with men (MSM) in the United States.

Kelvin E, Patel V, Mirzayi C, Anastos K, Grov C Int J Sex Health. 2021; 32(4):331-341.

PMID: 34141047 PMC: 8205508. DOI: 10.1080/19317611.2020.1813860.


Time for the US food and drug administration approval of condoms for anal intercourse.

Nguyen B, Nelson A EClinicalMedicine. 2020; 17:100226.

PMID: 31891150 PMC: 6933260. DOI: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2019.11.019.


Social and psychological correlates of unprotected anal intercourse among Hispanic-American women: implications for STI/HIV prevention.

Villar-Loubet O, Weiss S, Marks G, ODaniels C, Jones D, Metsch L Cult Health Sex. 2016; 18(11):1221-37.

PMID: 27268227 PMC: 5030148. DOI: 10.1080/13691058.2016.1182217.


Prevalence and Correlates of Heterosexual Anal Intercourse Among Men and Women, 20 U.S. Cities.

Hess K, DiNenno E, Sionean C, Ivy W, Paz-Bailey G AIDS Behav. 2016; 20(12):2966-2975.

PMID: 26781872 PMC: 4949144. DOI: 10.1007/s10461-016-1295-z.