» Articles » PMID: 17541605

Endoscopic Options in Management of Posterior Third Ventricular Tumors

Overview
Specialty Pediatrics
Date 2007 Jun 2
PMID 17541605
Citations 5
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: A spectrum of both radiosensitive and radio-resistant lesions occurs in the region of the posterior third ventricle (PTV). Most of these are associated with hydrocephalus requiring a cerebrospinal fluid diversion procedure. The present study aims to assess the effectiveness of endoscopic biopsy and third ventriculostomy (ETV) in these patients.

Materials And Methods: Twenty-four patients with PTV lesions with moderate to severe hydrocephalus were managed prospectively. All patients underwent ETV and biopsy of the lesion during the same procedure. The ETV could be performed in all patients, where as in 23, a successful biopsy could be obtained. The ETV was successful in 22 patients; it failed in 2 patients requiring shunt insertion. A positive biopsy was obtained in all the patients (pinealocytoma 4, pinealoblastoma 10, embryonal cell carcinoma 1, germinoma 2, oligodendroglioma 1, astrocytoma 2, tuberculoma 4). All patients were subsequently managed with further surgery, radiation, and chemotherapy either alone or in combination depending on the pathology. One patient with a tumor bed hematoma required clot evacuation. The follow-up period ranged from 12 to 36 months. Two patients died, one during hospital stay with a tumor bed hematoma and another at 6 months follow-up due to extensive leptomeningeal spread.

Conclusions: The high yield of endoscopic biopsy (100%) and success of ETV (91%) emphasizes its role in management of the diverse group of PTV lesions in arriving at the optimal definitive management.

Citing Articles

Neuroendoscopic management of posterior third ventricle ependymoma with intraaqueductal and fourth ventricle extension: a case report and review of the literature.

Prat-Acin R, Evangelista R, Conde R, Ayuso-Sacido A, Galeano I Childs Nerv Syst. 2017; 33(11):2057-2060.

PMID: 28721597 DOI: 10.1007/s00381-017-3543-6.


Endoscopic biopsy of brain tumors: Does the technique matter?.

Azab W, Nasim K, Chelghoum A, Parwez A, Salaheddin W Surg Neurol Int. 2014; 5:159.

PMID: 25506504 PMC: 4253053. DOI: 10.4103/2152-7806.144597.


An overview of the current surgical options for pineal region tumors.

Azab W, Nasim K, Salaheddin W Surg Neurol Int. 2014; 5:39.

PMID: 24818046 PMC: 4014815. DOI: 10.4103/2152-7806.129430.


Endoscopic third ventriculostomy.

Yadav Y, Parihar V, Pande S, Namdev H, Agarwal M J Neurosci Rural Pract. 2012; 3(2):163-73.

PMID: 22865970 PMC: 3409989. DOI: 10.4103/0976-3147.98222.


Tumors of the posterior third ventricular region in pediatric patients: The Indian perspective and a review of literature.

Behari S, Jaiswal S, Nair P, Garg P, Jaiswal A J Pediatr Neurosci. 2011; 6(Suppl 1):S56-71.

PMID: 22069432 PMC: 3208926. DOI: 10.4103/1817-1745.85713.

References
1.
Calaminus G, Bamberg M, Baranzelli M, Benoit Y, di Montezemolo L, Fossati-Bellani F . Intracranial germ cell tumors: a comprehensive update of the European data. Neuropediatrics. 1994; 25(1):26-32. DOI: 10.1055/s-2008-1071577. View

2.
Jennings M, Gelman R, Hochberg F . Intracranial germ-cell tumors: natural history and pathogenesis. J Neurosurg. 1985; 63(2):155-67. DOI: 10.3171/jns.1985.63.2.0155. View

3.
Rajshekhar V, Chandy M . Tuberculomas presenting as isolated intrinsic brain stem masses. Br J Neurosurg. 1997; 11(2):127-33. DOI: 10.1080/02688699746474. View

4.
Bruce J, STEIN B . Surgical management of pineal region tumors. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 1995; 134(3-4):130-5. DOI: 10.1007/BF01417679. View

5.
Mohanty A, Vasudev M, Sampath S, Radhesh S, Sastry Kolluri V . Failed endoscopic third ventriculostomy in children: management options. Pediatr Neurosurg. 2002; 37(6):304-9. DOI: 10.1159/000066310. View