» Articles » PMID: 17537217

Prospective Non-randomized Evaluation of Four Mediators of the Systemic Response After Extraperitoneal Laparoscopic and Open Retropubic Radical Prostatectomy

Overview
Journal BJU Int
Specialty Urology
Date 2007 Jun 1
PMID 17537217
Citations 11
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: To report a prospective, controlled, non-randomized patient study to determine the systemic response to extraperitoneal laparoscopic (eLRP) and open retropubic radical prostatectomy (RRP).

Patients And Methods: In all, 403 patients who had eLRP (163) or open RRP (240) were recruited; patients in both groups had similar preoperative staging. In addition to peri-operative variables (operative duration, complications, blood loss, transfusion rate, hospitalization, catheterization), oncological data (Gleason score, pathological stage, positive margins) were also compared. The extent of the systemic response to surgery-induced tissue trauma was measured in all patients, by assessing the levels of acute-phase markers C-reactive protein (CRP), serum amyloid A (SAA), interleukin-6 (IL-6) and IL-10 before, during and after RP.

Results: The duration of surgery, transfusion rate, hospital stay and duration of catheterization were comparable with those in previous studies. There was an increase in IL-6, CRP and SAA but no change in IL-10, and no differences between eLRP and RRP over the entire period assessed.

Conclusion: The invasiveness of eLRP could not be substantiated objectively based on the variables measured in this study. The surgical trauma and associated invasiveness of both methods were equivalent.

Citing Articles

LAPAROSCOPIC RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY: SINGLE CENTER CASE SERIES.

Penezic L, Kulis T, Hudolin T, Zekulic T, Saic H, Kastelan Z Acta Clin Croat. 2023; 61(Suppl 3):15-20.

PMID: 36938548 PMC: 10022405. DOI: 10.20471/acc.2022.61.s3.2.


Versatility of 3D laproscopy for radical prostatectomy: A single tertiary cancer center experience.

Jayaprakash D, Patel K, Mithi M, Neelamraju Lakshmi H, Pandya S Indian J Surg Oncol. 2022; 13(3):525-532.

PMID: 36187528 PMC: 9515265. DOI: 10.1007/s13193-022-01518-6.


Robotically assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy induces lower tissue trauma than radical retropubic prostatectomy.

Quinto D, Reis S, Zampolli L, Pimenta R, Guimaraes V, Viana N J Robot Surg. 2020; 15(1):147-151.

PMID: 33009987 DOI: 10.1007/s11701-020-01150-y.


Robot-assisted and laparoscopic vs open radical prostatectomy in clinically localized prostate cancer: perioperative, functional, and oncological outcomes: A Systematic review and meta-analysis.

Cao L, Yang Z, Qi L, Chen M Medicine (Baltimore). 2019; 98(22):e15770.

PMID: 31145297 PMC: 6709105. DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000015770.


Optimizing the formation of vesicourethral anastomosis and reduction of procedure time. A two-year experience with a modified technique for endoscopic running vesicourethral anastomosis.

Golabek T, Wiatr T, Przydacz M, Bukowczan J, Dudek P, Sobczynski R Cent European J Urol. 2015; 68(3):296-301.

PMID: 26568869 PMC: 4643710. DOI: 10.5173/ceju.2015.617.