» Articles » PMID: 17532036

Socioeconomic Inequalities in Food Purchasing: the Contribution of Respondent-perceived and Actual (objectively Measured) Price and Availability of Foods

Overview
Journal Prev Med
Specialty Public Health
Date 2007 May 29
PMID 17532036
Citations 63
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Research has shown that lower socioeconomic groups purchase foods that are less consistent with dietary recommendations. The price and availability of foods are thought to be important mediating factors between socioeconomic position and food purchasing.

Objectives: We examined the relative contribution of the perceived and objectively measured price and availability of recommended foods to household income differences in food purchasing.

Methods: Using a face-to-face interview, a random sample of Brisbane residents (n=812) were asked about their food purchasing choices in 2000. They were also asked about their perceptions of the price and availability of 'recommended' foods (i.e. choices lower in fat, saturated fat, sugar, salt or higher in fibre) in the supermarkets where they usually shopped. Audits measuring the actual availability and price of identical foods were conducted in the same supermarkets.

Results: Lower socioeconomic groups were less likely to make food purchasing choices consistent with dietary guideline recommendations. Objective availability and price differences were not associated with purchasing choices, nor did they contribute to socioeconomic inequalities in food purchasing choices. Perceived availability and price differences were associated with the purchase of recommended foods. Perceived availability made a small contribution to inequalities in food purchasing, however perceived price differences did not.

Conclusion: Socioeconomic inequalities in food purchasing are not mediated by differential availability of recommended foods and differences in price between recommended and regular foods in supermarkets, or by perceptions of their relative price. However, differential perceptions of the availability of recommended foods may play a small role in food purchasing inequalities.

Citing Articles

Are Dutch adults equally susceptible to nudging and pricing strategies? Secondary analyses of the Supreme Nudge parallel cluster-randomised controlled supermarket trial.

Stuber J, Beulens J, van Lierop J, Schuurman E, Lakerveld J, Mackenbach J BMC Med. 2024; 22(1):228.

PMID: 38853270 PMC: 11163734. DOI: 10.1186/s12916-024-03429-5.


Associations between the objective and perceived food environment and eating behavior in relation to socioeconomic status among adults in peri-urban settings: results from the CIVISANO study in Flanders, Belgium.

Inac Y, DHooghe S, Van Dyck D, Dury S, Vandevijvere S, Deforche B Int J Health Geogr. 2024; 23(1):10.

PMID: 38724949 PMC: 11080110. DOI: 10.1186/s12942-024-00369-4.


Real-world nudging, pricing, and mobile physical activity coaching was insufficient to improve lifestyle behaviours and cardiometabolic health: the Supreme Nudge parallel cluster-randomised controlled supermarket trial.

Stuber J, Mackenbach J, de Bruijn G, Gillebaart M, Hoenink J, Middel C BMC Med. 2024; 22(1):52.

PMID: 38303069 PMC: 10835818. DOI: 10.1186/s12916-024-03268-4.


Socio-Spatial Segregation of Unhealthy Food Environments across Public Schools in Santiago, Chile.

Kain J, Sandoval M, Orellana Y, Cruz N, Diez J, Weisstaub G Nutrients. 2024; 16(1).

PMID: 38201938 PMC: 10780824. DOI: 10.3390/nu16010108.


Development and Validation of a Perceived Community Food Accessibility Measurement Questionnaire for Korean Older Adults.

Hong J, Yang N, Kim K Nutrients. 2023; 15(19).

PMID: 37836585 PMC: 10574782. DOI: 10.3390/nu15194301.