» Articles » PMID: 17522834

[DNA Methylation on Urinalysis and As a Prognostic Marker in Urothelial Cancer of the Bladder]

Overview
Journal Urologe A
Specialty Urology
Date 2007 May 25
PMID 17522834
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Introduction And Objectives: Detection of promoter hypermethylation has been proposed as a promising tool for cancer diagnosis and as a prognostic marker in various cancers. We studied the versatility of DNA methylation for noninvasive diagnosis and as a prognostic marker for non-muscle-invasive bladder carcinoma.

Methods: Tumor specimens were microdissected and DNA was extracted from 105 paraffin-embedded paraffin specimens from patients undergoing transurethral resection for non-muscle-invasive bladder carcinoma. Urine specimens were collected from patients undergoing cystectomy for bladder cancer and from healthy volunteers. Methylation status was assessed with the real-time quantitative methylation-sensitive PCR (MethyLight). We checked a panel of 20 cancer-associated genes (p14ARF, p16 CDKN2A, STAT-1, SOCS-1, DR-3, DR-6, PIG-7, BCL-2, H-TERT, BAX, EDNRB, DAPK, RASSF-1A, FADD, TMS-1, E-CADHERIN, ICAM-1, TIMP-3, MLH-1, COX-2) for DNA methylation.

Results: Follow-up data were available in 95 of 105 patients (91.4%). A tumor recurrence was observed in 26 patients (27.3%). We could identify six genes (SOCS-1, STAT-1, BCL-2, DAPK, TIMP-3, E-cadherin), where methylation was associated with tumor recurrence. In Kaplan-Meier analysis, TIMP-3 showed a significant association with recurrence-free survival. Methylation of TIMP-3 predicted prolonged disease-free interval. Regarding urinalysis we could identify a pattern of methylation markers including DAPK, BCL-2, and H-TERT that yielded a sensitivity of 81.1% with a specificity of 100% in a cancer-free control population

Conclusions: We present data on the clinical usefulness of methylation analysis in bladder carcinoma. Our data confirm that methylation analysis is a promising tool for bladder cancer diagnosis and prognosis.

Citing Articles

The Development of Non-Invasive Diagnostic Tools in Bladder Cancer.

Schulz A, Loloi J, Martina L, Sankin A Onco Targets Ther. 2022; 15:497-507.

PMID: 35529887 PMC: 9075009. DOI: 10.2147/OTT.S283891.


Trends in urine biomarker discovery for urothelial bladder cancer: DNA, RNA, or protein?.

Humayun-Zakaria N, Ward D, Arnold R, Bryan R Transl Androl Urol. 2021; 10(6):2787-2808.

PMID: 34295762 PMC: 8261432. DOI: 10.21037/tau-20-1327.


RASSF-1A modulates proliferation-mediated oral squamous cell carcinoma progression.

Sun J Cancer Cell Int. 2019; 19:213.

PMID: 31423110 PMC: 6693157. DOI: 10.1186/s12935-019-0932-9.

References
1.
Esteller M, Corn P, Baylin S, Herman J . A gene hypermethylation profile of human cancer. Cancer Res. 2001; 61(8):3225-9. View

2.
Tsujii M, DuBois R . Alterations in cellular adhesion and apoptosis in epithelial cells overexpressing prostaglandin endoperoxide synthase 2. Cell. 1995; 83(3):493-501. DOI: 10.1016/0092-8674(95)90127-2. View

3.
Simon M, Lokeshwar V, Soloway M . Current bladder cancer tests: unnecessary or beneficial?. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2003; 47(2):91-107. DOI: 10.1016/s1040-8428(03)00074-x. View

4.
Toma M, Friedrich M, Hautmann S, Jakel K, Erbersdobler A, Hellstern A . Comparison of the ImmunoCyt test and urinary cytology with other urine tests in the detection and surveillance of bladder cancer. World J Urol. 2004; 22(2):145-9. DOI: 10.1007/s00345-003-0390-8. View

5.
Friedrich M, Toma M, Hellstern A, Pantel K, Weisenberger D, Noldus J . Comparison of multitarget fluorescence in situ hybridization in urine with other noninvasive tests for detecting bladder cancer. BJU Int. 2003; 92(9):911-4. DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-410x.2003.04528.x. View