» Articles » PMID: 17522028

Neurogenesis and the Spacing Effect: Learning over Time Enhances Memory and the Survival of New Neurons

Overview
Journal Learn Mem
Specialty Neurology
Date 2007 May 25
PMID 17522028
Citations 58
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Information that is spaced over time is better remembered than the same amount of information massed together. This phenomenon, known as the spacing effect, was explored with respect to its effect on learning and neurogenesis in the adult dentate gyrus of the hippocampal formation. Because the cells are generated over time and because learning enhances their survival, we hypothesized that training with spaced trials would rescue more new neurons from death than the same number of massed trials. In the first experiment, animals trained with spaced trials in the Morris water maze outperformed animals trained with massed trials, but there was not a direct effect of trial spacing on cell survival. Rather, animals that learned well retained more cells than animals that did not learn or learned poorly. Moreover, performance during acquisition correlated with the number of cells remaining in the dentate gyrus after training. In the second experiment, the time between blocks of trials was increased. Consequently, animals trained with spaced trials performed as well as those trained with massed, but remembered the location better two weeks later. The strength of that memory correlated with the number of new cells remaining in the hippocampus. Together, these data indicate that learning, and not mere exposure to training, enhances the survival of cells that are generated 1 wk before training. They also indicate that learning over an extended period of time induces a more persistent memory, which then relates to the number of cells that reside in the hippocampus.

Citing Articles

The massed-spaced learning effect in non-neural human cells.

Kukushkin N, Carney R, Tabassum T, Carew T Nat Commun. 2024; 15(1):9635.

PMID: 39511210 PMC: 11544106. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-024-53922-x.


Specific patterns of neural activity in the hippocampus after massed or distributed spatial training.

Centofante E, Fralleoni L, Lupascu C, Migliore M, Rinaldi A, Mele A Sci Rep. 2023; 13(1):13357.

PMID: 37587232 PMC: 10432541. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-39882-0.


The effects of high versus low frequency of combined physical and cognitive training on cognitive function in older adults with cognitive decline: a quasi-experimental study.

Chuang I, Chen I, Su K, Wu Y, Wu C BMC Geriatr. 2023; 23(1):94.

PMID: 36788482 PMC: 9926662. DOI: 10.1186/s12877-023-03802-8.


A gut microbiome tactile teaching tool and guided-inquiry activity promotes student learning.

Shoaf P, French K, Clifford N, McKenney E, Ott L Front Microbiol. 2023; 13:966289.

PMID: 36620056 PMC: 9813521. DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.966289.


Heksor: the central nervous system substrate of an adaptive behaviour.

Wolpaw J, Kamesar A J Physiol. 2022; 600(15):3423-3452.

PMID: 35771667 PMC: 9545119. DOI: 10.1113/JP283291.


References
1.
McGaugh J . Time-dependent processes in memory storage. Science. 1966; 153(3742):1351-8. DOI: 10.1126/science.153.3742.1351. View

2.
Hairston I, Little M, Scanlon M, Barakat M, Palmer T, Sapolsky R . Sleep restriction suppresses neurogenesis induced by hippocampus-dependent learning. J Neurophysiol. 2005; 94(6):4224-33. DOI: 10.1152/jn.00218.2005. View

3.
Karni A, Tanne D, Rubenstein B, Askenasy J, Sagi D . Dependence on REM sleep of overnight improvement of a perceptual skill. Science. 1994; 265(5172):679-82. DOI: 10.1126/science.8036518. View

4.
Yin J, Del Vecchio M, Zhou H, Tully T . CREB as a memory modulator: induced expression of a dCREB2 activator isoform enhances long-term memory in Drosophila. Cell. 1995; 81(1):107-15. DOI: 10.1016/0092-8674(95)90375-5. View

5.
Tsien J, Huerta P, Tonegawa S . The essential role of hippocampal CA1 NMDA receptor-dependent synaptic plasticity in spatial memory. Cell. 1996; 87(7):1327-38. DOI: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)81827-9. View