» Articles » PMID: 17516148

Seeking Perfection: a Kantian Look at Human Genetic Engineering

Overview
Publisher Springer
Specialty Medical Ethics
Date 2007 May 23
PMID 17516148
Citations 1
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

It is tempting to argue that Kantian moral philosophy justifies prohibiting both human germ-line genetic engineering and non-therapeutic genetic engineering because they fail to respect human dignity. There are, however, good reasons for resisting this temptation. In fact, Kant's moral philosophy provides reasons that support genetic engineering-even germ-line and non-therapeutic. This is true of Kant's imperfect duties to seek one's own perfection and the happiness of others. It is also true of the categorical imperative. Kant's moral philosophy does, however, provide limits to justifiable genetic engineering.

Citing Articles

Could Genetic Enhancement Really Lead to Obsolescence?.

Zuk P, Kostick K, Lazaro-Munoz G Am J Bioeth. 2019; 19(7):34-36.

PMID: 31543070 PMC: 6760321. DOI: 10.1080/15265161.2019.1618962.

References
1.
Munson R, Davis L . Germ-line gene therapy and the medical imperative. Kennedy Inst Ethics J. 1992; 2(2):137-58. DOI: 10.1353/ken.0.0091. View

2.
Allhoff F . Germ-line genetic enhancement and Rawlsian primary goods. Kennedy Inst Ethics J. 2005; 15(1):39-56. DOI: 10.1353/ken.2005.0007. View

3.
Lappe M . Ethical issues in manipulating the human germ line. J Med Philos. 1991; 16(6):621-39. DOI: 10.1093/jmp/16.6.621. View

4.
Harding J . Beyond abortion: human genetics and the new eugenics. Pepperdine Law Rev. 1991; 18(1):471-512. View

5.
Lauritzen P . Stem cells, biotechnology, and human rights: implications for a posthuman future. Hastings Cent Rep. 2005; 35(2):25-33. View