» Articles » PMID: 17507060

Impaired Spatial and Non-spatial Configural Learning in Patients with Hippocampal Pathology

Overview
Specialties Neurology
Psychology
Date 2007 May 18
PMID 17507060
Citations 22
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The hippocampus has been proposed to play a critical role in memory through its unique ability to bind together the disparate elements of an experience. This hypothesis has been widely examined in rodents using a class of tasks known as "configural" or "non-linear", where outcomes are determined by specific combinations of elements, rather than any single element alone. On the basis of equivocal evidence that hippocampal lesions impair performance on non-spatial configural tasks, it has been proposed that the hippocampus may only be critical for spatial configural learning. Surprisingly few studies in humans have examined the role of the hippocampus in solving configural problems. In particular, no previous study has directly assessed the human hippocampal contribution to non-spatial and spatial configural learning, the focus of the current study. Our results show that patients with primary damage to the hippocampus bilaterally were similarly impaired at configural learning within both spatial and non-spatial domains. Our data also provide evidence that residual configural learning can occur in the presence of significant hippocampal dysfunction. Moreover, evidence obtained from a post-experimental debriefing session suggested that patients acquired declarative knowledge of the underlying task contingencies that corresponded to the best-fit strategy identified by our strategy analysis. In summary, our findings support the notion that the hippocampus plays an important role in both spatial and non-spatial configural learning, and provide insights into the role of the medial temporal lobe (MTL) more generally in incremental reinforcement-driven learning.

Citing Articles

Differential effects of bilateral hippocampal CA3 damage on the implicit learning and recognition of complex event sequences.

Miller T, Kennard C, Gowland P, Antoniades C, Rosenthal C Cogn Neurosci. 2024; 15(2):27-55.

PMID: 38384107 PMC: 11147457. DOI: 10.1080/17588928.2024.2315818.


Tracking the Emergence of Location-based Spatial Representations in Human Scene-Selective Cortex.

Berens S, Joensen B, Horner A J Cogn Neurosci. 2020; 33(3):445-462.

PMID: 33284080 PMC: 8658499. DOI: 10.1162/jocn_a_01654.


Effects of to Enhance Learning and Memory in a Conditioned Nicotinic and Muscarinic Receptor Response Paradigm by Modulation of Cholinergic Mechanisms in Rats.

Yildirim C, Aydin S, Donertas B, Oner S, Kilic F J Med Food. 2019; 23(4):388-394.

PMID: 31580752 PMC: 7185363. DOI: 10.1089/jmf.2018.0197.


Scenes facilitate associative memory and integration.

Robin J, Olsen R Learn Mem. 2019; 26(7):252-261.

PMID: 31209120 PMC: 6581001. DOI: 10.1101/lm.049486.119.


Verbal Paired Associates and the Hippocampus: The Role of Scenes.

Clark I, Kim M, Maguire E J Cogn Neurosci. 2018; 30(12):1821-1845.

PMID: 30063178 PMC: 6380605. DOI: 10.1162/jocn_a_01315.


References
1.
King J, Burgess N, Hartley T, Vargha-Khadem F, OKeefe J . Human hippocampus and viewpoint dependence in spatial memory. Hippocampus. 2003; 12(6):811-20. DOI: 10.1002/hipo.10070. View

2.
Squire L, Stark C, Clark R . The medial temporal lobe. Annu Rev Neurosci. 2004; 27:279-306. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.neuro.27.070203.144130. View

3.
Sutherland R, McDonald R, Hill C, Rudy J . Damage to the hippocampal formation in rats selectively impairs the ability to learn cue relationships. Behav Neural Biol. 1989; 52(3):331-56. DOI: 10.1016/s0163-1047(89)90457-3. View

4.
Alvarado M, Rudy J . Rats with damage to the hippocampal-formation are impaired on the transverse-patterning problem but not on elemental discriminations. Behav Neurosci. 1995; 109(2):204-11. DOI: 10.1037//0735-7044.109.2.204. View

5.
Moses S, Ryan J . A comparison and evaluation of the predictions of relational and conjunctive accounts of hippocampal function. Hippocampus. 2005; 16(1):43-65. DOI: 10.1002/hipo.20131. View