» Articles » PMID: 17504588

Effect of the Characteristics of Family Physicians on Their Utilisation of Laboratory Tests

Overview
Journal Br J Gen Pract
Specialty Public Health
Date 2007 May 17
PMID 17504588
Citations 12
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: The use of laboratory tests by family physicians has increased in recent years.

Aims: To evaluate the relationship between family physicians' characteristics and the number and type of laboratory tests requested, taking into account chronic diseases.

Design Of Study: Retrospective, cross-sectional study.

Setting: One hundred and sixty-two physicians treating 230 123 patients in one district of a health management organisation in Israel.

Method: Physicians' use of 16 common types of laboratory tests was assessed in relation to physicians' demographic, professional, and clinic characteristics. The utilisation rate over 1 year was divided into quintiles for each laboratory test, and each physician was given a global laboratory score (for each test the physician got a score from 1 (utilisation in the lower quintile) to 5 (higher quintile). The global score was the sum of scores of the individual tests.

Results: On logistic regression analysis, four background characteristics were associated with the global score for the utilisation of laboratory tests. The highest hazard ratios were for being a female doctor (3.2, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.5 to 6.5), working in an urban clinic (3.2, 95% CI = 1.1 to 9.8), and having a greater workload than doctors in rural clinics (1.4, 95% CI = 1.1 to 1.8). Being a graduate of a Western country or Israel had a negative association with the global score (0.4, 95% CI = 0.1 to 0.99).

Conclusion: Female sex and working in a urban clinic were major factors in the use of laboratory tests in clinical practice. As more women enter the medical profession, an improved understanding of the sex differences in ordering medical tests is important.

Citing Articles

General practitioner gender and use of diagnostic procedures: a French cross-sectional study in training practices.

Bouissiere A, Laperrouse M, Panjo H, Ringa V, Rigal L, Letrilliart L BMJ Open. 2022; 12(5):e054486.

PMID: 35523487 PMC: 9083381. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-054486.


Deep into Laboratory: An Artificial Intelligence Approach to Recommend Laboratory Tests.

Islam M, Poly T, Yang H, Li Y Diagnostics (Basel). 2021; 11(6).

PMID: 34072571 PMC: 8227070. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics11060990.


Trends and Between-Physician Variation in Laboratory Testing: A Retrospective Longitudinal Study in General Practice.

Schumacher L, Jager L, Meier R, Rachamin Y, Senn O, Rosemann T J Clin Med. 2020; 9(6).

PMID: 32521786 PMC: 7355885. DOI: 10.3390/jcm9061787.


Perspective of healthy asymptomatic patients requesting general blood tests from their physicians: a qualitative study.

Shaked M, Levkovich I, Adar T, Peri A, Liviatan N BMC Fam Pract. 2019; 20(1):51.

PMID: 30953452 PMC: 6451261. DOI: 10.1186/s12875-019-0940-9.


Diagnostic and laboratory test ordering in Northern Portuguese Primary Health Care: a cross-sectional study.

Sa L, Teixeira A, Tavares F, Costa-Santos C, Couto L, Costa-Pereira A BMJ Open. 2017; 7(11):e018509.

PMID: 29146654 PMC: 5695440. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-018509.


References
1.
Kristiansen I, Hjortdahl P . The general practitioner and laboratory utilization: why does it vary?. Fam Pract. 1992; 9(1):22-7. DOI: 10.1093/fampra/9.1.22. View

2.
Zaat J, van Eijk J . General practitioners' uncertainty, risk preference, and use of laboratory tests. Med Care. 1992; 30(9):846-54. DOI: 10.1097/00005650-199209000-00008. View

3.
Salloum S, Franssen E . Laboratory investigations in general practice. Can Fam Physician. 1993; 39:1055-61. PMC: 2379631. View

4.
Goold S, Hofer T, Zimmerman M, Hayward R . Measuring physician attitudes toward cost, uncertainty, malpractice, and utilization review. J Gen Intern Med. 1994; 9(10):544-9. DOI: 10.1007/BF02599278. View

5.
Leurquin P, Van Casteren V, De Maeseneer J . Use of blood tests in general practice: a collaborative study in eight European countries. Eurosentinel Study Group. Br J Gen Pract. 1995; 45(390):21-5. PMC: 1239108. View