» Articles » PMID: 17496054

Limited Value of Morphological Assessment at Days 1 and 2 to Predict Blastocyst Development Potential: a Prospective Study Based on 4042 Embryos

Overview
Journal Hum Reprod
Date 2007 May 15
PMID 17496054
Citations 36
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Non-invasive and routine developmental markers are available to select the most viable embryo; however their respective values in terms of blastocyst development potential remain difficult to distinguish.

Methods: During this prospective study, the sequential growth of 4042 embryos individually cultured from day 1 to day 5/6 was recorded. Pronuclear morphology on day 1, and early cleavage, cell number and fragmentation rate on day 2 were evaluated for each zygote. Additionally, blastocyst transfers were analysed with regard to their implantation ability and early embryo development parameters.

Results: Once adjusted to each other, each of the four parameters remained related to blastocyst development. Early cleavage and cell number on day 2 were the most powerful parameters to predict the development of a good morphology blastocyst at day 5. Moreover, whereas transfers of a good morphology blastocyst were associated with high implantation and live birth rates, parameters of early development were not helpful in predicting their implantation ability.

Conclusions: The combination of all four parameters allowed the prediction of blastocyst development with an area under the receiver operating characteristics curve of 0.688, which represents a fairly low prediction of embryo viability. Such results indicate that it is necessary to search for additional criteria, including the ability of the blastocyst to develop.

Citing Articles

B cell translocation gene 2 expression levels in human granulosa cells is negatively associated with in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection outcomes: a pilot study.

Luo J, Wang H, Zhou L, Wang L, Wang J, Song M J Assist Reprod Genet. 2025; .

PMID: 39856376 DOI: 10.1007/s10815-025-03391-y.


Effect of cytoplasmic fragmentation on embryo development, quality, and pregnancy outcome: a systematic review of the literature.

Yazdani A, Halvaei I, Boniface C, Esfandiari N Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2024; 22(1):55.

PMID: 38745305 PMC: 11092204. DOI: 10.1186/s12958-024-01217-7.


Label-free, high-throughput holographic imaging to evaluate mammalian gametes and embryos†.

Wheeler M, Rabel R, Rubessa M, Popescu G Biol Reprod. 2024; 110(6):1125-1134.

PMID: 38733568 PMC: 11180620. DOI: 10.1093/biolre/ioae057.


The importance of cytoplasmic strings during early human embryonic development.

Joo K, Nemes A, Dudas B, Berkes-Bara E, Murber A, Urbancsek J Front Cell Dev Biol. 2023; 11:1177279.

PMID: 37497477 PMC: 10366360. DOI: 10.3389/fcell.2023.1177279.


Non-obstructive idiopathic azoospermia vs azoospermia with antecedents of cryptorchidism: ways and probabilities of becoming parents.

Sangwan J, Petit C, Rose R, Frapsauce C, Dijols L, Rigot J Basic Clin Androl. 2021; 31(1):30.

PMID: 34879816 PMC: 8656044. DOI: 10.1186/s12610-021-00149-1.