» Articles » PMID: 1748136

Comparison of the Cardiovascular Effects of Nifedipine and Nicardipine in the Presence of Atenolol

Overview
Specialty Pharmacology
Date 1991 Jan 1
PMID 1748136
Citations 1
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

A placebo controlled double blind crossover study was performed in 12 healthy volunteers to compare the cardiovascular effects of single oral doses of nifedipine (5, 10 and 15 mg) and nicardipine (20 and 30 mg) in the presence of atenolol 100 mg. Haemodynamic measurements were made by transthoracic electrical bioimpedance cardiography (TEBC) 2 h following drug administration during passive tilting, graded bicycle exercise (30-150 W) and recovery from exercise. In the absence of calcium channel blockade, atenolol reduced mean blood pressure, heart rate, and cardiac index, and increased stroke volume, peripheral resistance, pre-ejection period, and ventricular ejection time, particularly during and after exercise. In comparison with atenolol alone, addition of nifedipine or nicardipine reduced peripheral resistance but did not produce significant changes in stroke volume, cardiac output, dZ/dt [max], pre-ejection period (PEP). Ventricular ejection time (VET), PEP/VET, or Heather index at any point in the experiment. Similar reductions in peripheral resistance were produced by nifedipine 10 mg and nicardipine 20 and 30 mg. These apparently equivalent doses of nifedipine and nicardipine had similar effects on stroke volume, cardiac index, PEP/VET and Heather index. Thus the increases in ventricular performance previously demonstrated in association with nifedipine and nicardipine therapy were not observed in the presence of beta-adrenoceptor blockade. Under these conditions no important differences have been observed in the cardiovascular effects of these two calcium channel blockers.

Citing Articles

Differential cardiovascular effects of propranolol, atenolol, and pindolol measured by impedance cardiography.

Thomas S, Cooper R, Ekwuru M, Fletcher S, Gilbody J, Husseyin T Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 1992; 42(1):47-53.

PMID: 1541316 DOI: 10.1007/BF00314919.

References
1.
Leon M, Rosing D, Bonow R, Lipson L, Epstein S . Clinical efficacy of verapamil alone and combined with propranolol in treating patients with chronic stable angina pectoris. Am J Cardiol. 1981; 48(1):131-9. DOI: 10.1016/0002-9149(81)90582-8. View

2.
Stern H, Matthews J, Belz G . Intrinsic and reflex actions of verapamil and nifedipine: assessment in normal subjects by noninvasive techniques and autonomic blockade. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 1986; 29(5):541-7. DOI: 10.1007/BF00635890. View

3.
STAFFURTH J, Emery P . Adverse interaction between nifedipine and beta-blockade. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1981; 282(6259):225. PMC: 1503954. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.282.6259.225-a. View

4.
Maclean D, MITCHELL E, Coulson R, Fitzsimons T, McDevitt D . Atenolol-nifedipine combinations compared to atenolol alone in hypertension: efficacy and tolerability. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 1988; 25(4):425-31. PMC: 1387803. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.1988.tb03325.x. View

5.
Cody R . Use of invasive ergometric exercise to assess the hemodynamic response to nicardipine. Am J Cardiol. 1987; 59(17):20J-24J. DOI: 10.1016/0002-9149(87)90209-8. View