» Articles » PMID: 17480025

Chemotopic Odorant Coding in a Mammalian Olfactory System

Overview
Journal J Comp Neurol
Specialty Neurology
Date 2007 May 8
PMID 17480025
Citations 118
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Systematic mapping studies involving 365 odorant chemicals have shown that glomerular responses in the rat olfactory bulb are organized spatially in patterns that are related to the chemistry of the odorant stimuli. This organization involves the spatial clustering of principal responses to numerous odorants that share key aspects of chemistry such as functional groups, hydrocarbon structural elements, and/or overall molecular properties related to water solubility. In several of the clusters, responses shift progressively in position according to odorant carbon chain length. These response domains appear to be constructed from orderly projections of sensory neurons in the olfactory epithelium and may also involve chromatography across the nasal mucosa. The spatial clustering of glomerular responses may serve to "tune" the principal responses of bulbar projection neurons by way of inhibitory interneuronal networks, allowing the projection neurons to respond to a narrower range of stimuli than their associated sensory neurons. When glomerular activity patterns are viewed relative to the overall level of glomerular activation, the patterns accurately predict the perception of odor quality, thereby supporting the notion that spatial patterns of activity are the key factors underlying that aspect of the olfactory code. A critical analysis suggests that alternative coding mechanisms for odor quality, such as those based on temporal patterns of responses, enjoy little experimental support.

Citing Articles

Shapley Fields Reveal Chemotopic Organization in the Mouse Olfactory Bulb Across Diverse Chemical Feature Sets.

Milicevic N, Burton S, Wachowiak M, Itskov V bioRxiv. 2025; .

PMID: 40060549 PMC: 11888437. DOI: 10.1101/2025.02.26.640432.


Odor representation and coding by the mitral/tufted cells in the olfactory bulb.

Wang P, Li S, Li A J Zhejiang Univ Sci B. 2024; 25(10):824-840.

PMID: 39420520 PMC: 11494158. DOI: 10.1631/jzus.B2400051.


Basal Forebrain Modulation of Olfactory Coding .

Venegas J, Navarrete M, Orellana-Garcia L, Rojas M, Avello-Duarte F, Nunez-Parra A Int J Psychol Res (Medellin). 2023; 16(2):62-86.

PMID: 38106956 PMC: 10723750. DOI: 10.21500/20112084.6486.


Microwaves affect the formation of volatile compounds in peper powder by changing the nucleophilic addition reactions in Maillard reactions.

Wang Z, Liu X, Fang Y, Wang X, Hu Y, Li Y Food Chem X. 2023; 19:100828.

PMID: 37780296 PMC: 10534142. DOI: 10.1016/j.fochx.2023.100828.


The method for assessment of local permutations in the glomerular patterns of the rat olfactory bulb by aligning interindividual odor maps.

Matukhno A, Petrushan M, Kiroy V, Arsenyev F, Lysenko L J Comput Neurosci. 2023; 51(4):433-444.

PMID: 37624481 DOI: 10.1007/s10827-023-00858-8.


References
1.
Inaki K, Takahashi Y, Nagayama S, Mori K . Molecular-feature domains with posterodorsal-anteroventral polarity in the symmetrical sensory maps of the mouse olfactory bulb: mapping of odourant-induced Zif268 expression. Eur J Neurosci. 2002; 15(10):1563-74. DOI: 10.1046/j.1460-9568.2002.01991.x. View

2.
ADRIAN E . The electrical activity of the mammalian olfactory bulb. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1950; 2(4):377-88. DOI: 10.1016/0013-4694(50)90075-7. View

3.
Vassar R, Ngai J, Axel R . Spatial segregation of odorant receptor expression in the mammalian olfactory epithelium. Cell. 1993; 74(2):309-18. DOI: 10.1016/0092-8674(93)90422-m. View

4.
Wachowiak M, Denk W, Friedrich R . Functional organization of sensory input to the olfactory bulb glomerulus analyzed by two-photon calcium imaging. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004; 101(24):9097-102. PMC: 428479. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0400438101. View

5.
Johnson B, Leon M . Modular representations of odorants in the glomerular layer of the rat olfactory bulb and the effects of stimulus concentration. J Comp Neurol. 2000; 422(4):496-509. DOI: 10.1002/1096-9861(20000710)422:4<496::aid-cne2>3.0.co;2-4. View