» Articles » PMID: 17477862

Performance in the MRCP(UK) Examination 2003-4: Analysis of Pass Rates of UK Graduates in Relation to Self-declared Ethnicity and Gender

Overview
Journal BMC Med
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2007 May 5
PMID 17477862
Citations 44
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Male students and students from ethnic minorities have been reported to under-perform in undergraduate medical examinations. We examined the effects of ethnicity and gender on pass rates in UK medical graduates sitting the Membership of the Royal Colleges of Physicians in the United Kingdom [MRCP(UK)] Examination in 2003-4.

Methods: Pass rates for each part of the examination were analysed for differences between graduate groupings based on self-declared ethnicity and gender.

Results: All candidates declared their gender, and 84-90% declared their ethnicity. In all three parts of the examination, white candidates performed better than other ethnic groups (P < 0.001). In the MRCP(UK) Part 1 and Part 2 Written Examinations, there was no significant difference in pass rate between male and female graduates, nor was there any interaction between gender and ethnicity. In the Part 2 Clinical Examination (Practical Assessment of Clinical Examination Skills, PACES), women performed better than did men (P < 0.001). Non-white men performed more poorly than expected, relative to white men or non-white women. Analysis of individual station marks showed significant interaction between candidate and examiner ethnicity for performance on communication skills (P = 0.011), but not on clinical skills (P = 0.176). Analysis of overall average marks showed no interaction between candidate gender and the number of assessments made by female examiners (P = 0.151).

Conclusion: The cause of these differences is most likely to be multifactorial, but cannot be readily explained in terms of previous educational experience or differential performance on particular parts of the examination. Potential examiner prejudice, significant only in the cases where there were two non-white examiners and the candidate was non-white, might indicate different cultural interpretations of the judgements being made.

Citing Articles

Differential attainment at national selection for higher surgical training: a retrospective cohort study.

Ellis R, Al-Tawarah Y, Brennan P, Lee A, Hines J, Cleland J BMJ Open. 2025; 15(1):e091796.

PMID: 39880430 PMC: 11781144. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-091796.


Does candidate race influence simulated patient ratings in standardised assessments of clinical practice? A single-blinded randomised study in UK medical schools.

Brown C, Sebastian A, Khavandi S, Badger K, Westacott R, Reed M BMJ Open. 2025; 15(1):e080543.

PMID: 39819914 PMC: 11751911. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-080543.


Beyond multiple choice: Clinical simulation as a rigorous and inclusive method for assessing genetic counseling competencies.

Cho M, Davis C, Lowe C, Flynn M, Jamal L, Bajaj K J Genet Couns. 2024; 33(1):118-123.

PMID: 38351603 PMC: 10922725. DOI: 10.1002/jgc4.1878.


The ISAC Paradigm to Tame Oral Cancer in Saudi Arabia: A Quasi-experimental Study.

Jafer M, Moafa I, Hoving C, Candel M, Kaabi A, van den Borne B J Cancer Educ. 2023; 38(6):1901-1909.

PMID: 37594623 PMC: 10656309. DOI: 10.1007/s13187-023-02356-y.


Ethnic differences in success at application for consultant posts among United Kingdom physicians from 2011 to 2019: a retrospective cross-sectional observational study.

Harvey P, Phillips C, Newbery N, Nagamoottoo D, Woolf K, Trudgill N J R Soc Med. 2022; 115(8):300-312.

PMID: 35357252 PMC: 9340099. DOI: 10.1177/01410768221085691.


References
1.
Roberts C, Sarangi S, Southgate L, Wakeford R, Wass V . Oral examinations-equal opportunities, ethnicity, and fairness in the MRCGP. BMJ. 2000; 320(7231):370-5. PMC: 1127149. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.320.7231.370. View

2.
McManus I, Thompson M, Mollon J . Assessment of examiner leniency and stringency ('hawk-dove effect') in the MRCP(UK) clinical examination (PACES) using multi-facet Rasch modelling. BMC Med Educ. 2006; 6:42. PMC: 1569374. DOI: 10.1186/1472-6920-6-42. View

3.
Wass V, Roberts C, Hoogenboom R, Jones R, van der Vleuten C . Effect of ethnicity on performance in a final objective structured clinical examination: qualitative and quantitative study. BMJ. 2003; 326(7393):800-3. PMC: 153100. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.326.7393.800. View

4.
van Zanten M, Boulet J, McKinley D . Correlates of performance of the ECFMG Clinical Skills Assessment: influences of candidate characteristics on performance. Acad Med. 2003; 78(10 Suppl):S72-4. DOI: 10.1097/00001888-200310001-00023. View

5.
Zaharias G, Piterman L, Liddell M . Doctors and patients: gender interaction in the consultation. Acad Med. 2004; 79(2):148-55. DOI: 10.1097/00001888-200402000-00011. View