» Articles » PMID: 17473963

Risky Communication: Pitfalls in Counseling About Risk, and How to Avoid Them

Overview
Journal J Genet Couns
Publisher Wiley
Specialty Genetics
Date 2007 May 3
PMID 17473963
Citations 14
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

A genetic counselor is often faced with the difficult task of conveying a set of complex and highly abstract factors associated with the client's risk of developing a familial disorder. The client is faced with the even more difficult task of making significant health-related decisions about an event which may or may not eventuate. Although there is a large corpus of research on this topic, much of the knowledge on risk communication is difficult to apply in a practical context. In this paper we draw together some insights on risk communication and decision-making under conditions of uncertainty, and apply them directly to the problem of communicating familial cancer risk. In particular, we focus on the distinction between individual risk and observed frequencies of adverse events, various framing effects, and contextualizing risk communication. We draw attention to some of the potential pitfalls in counseling about risk and offer avenues for circumventing them.

Citing Articles

Perspectives on returning individual and aggregate genomic research results to study participants and communities in Kenya: a qualitative study.

Kisiangani I, Mohamed S, Kyobutungi C, Tindana P, Ghansah A, Ramsay M BMC Med Ethics. 2022; 23(1):27.

PMID: 35300680 PMC: 8932129. DOI: 10.1186/s12910-022-00767-y.


Patients' Medical and Psychosocial Experiences After Detection of a Variant With Multigene Panel Testing.

Hamilton J, Long J, Brandt A, Brower J, Symecko H, Salo-Mullen E JCO Precis Oncol. 2019; 3.

PMID: 31511843 PMC: 6738946. DOI: 10.1200/PO.18.00300.


Danish Sonographers' Experiences of the Introduction of "Moderate Risk" in Prenatal Screening for Down Syndrome.

Moller A, Vogel I, Petersen O, Lou S J Pregnancy. 2018; 2018:1646035.

PMID: 30402287 PMC: 6198582. DOI: 10.1155/2018/1646035.


Women's decision-making regarding risk-stratified breast cancer screening and prevention from the perspective of international healthcare professionals.

Rainey L, van der Waal D, Donnelly L, Evans D, Wengstrom Y, Broeders M PLoS One. 2018; 13(6):e0197772.

PMID: 29856760 PMC: 5983562. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0197772.


Young Women's Perceptions Regarding Communication with Healthcare Providers About Breast Cancer, Risk, and Prevention.

Lunsford N, Sapsis K, Smither B, Reynolds J, Wilburn B, Fairley T J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2017; 27(2):162-170.

PMID: 28472603 PMC: 6074024. DOI: 10.1089/jwh.2016.6140.


References
1.
Edwards A, Elwyn G, Mulley A . Explaining risks: turning numerical data into meaningful pictures. BMJ. 2002; 324(7341):827-30. PMC: 1122766. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.324.7341.827. View

2.
Rothman A, Kiviniemi M . Treating people with information: an analysis and review of approaches to communicating health risk information. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 2000; (25):44-51. DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.jncimonographs.a024207. View

3.
Hallowell N . A qualitative study of the information needs of high-risk women undergoing prophylactic oophorectomy. Psychooncology. 2001; 9(6):486-95. DOI: 10.1002/1099-1611(200011/12)9:6<486::aid-pon478>3.0.co;2-y. View

4.
Trevena L, Davey H, Barratt A, Butow P, Caldwell P . A systematic review on communicating with patients about evidence. J Eval Clin Pract. 2006; 12(1):13-23. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2005.00596.x. View

5.
Facione N . Perceived risk of breast cancer: influence of heuristic thinking. Cancer Pract. 2002; 10(5):256-62. DOI: 10.1046/j.1523-5394.2002.105005.x. View