» Articles » PMID: 17470931

The Department of Health's Research Governance Framework Remains an Impediment to Multi-centre Studies: Findings from a National Descriptive Study

Overview
Journal J R Soc Med
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2007 May 2
PMID 17470931
Citations 11
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: We describe our experience of using the standard application form, designed to streamline applications for multi-centre research, to seek approval from all primary care organizations (PCOs) in England and Wales to undertake a single telephone interview with a health service manager.

Design: We sent applications (n=316), by email to each PCO, or consortium of PCOs, attaching a completed standard application form, the 15 required documents, and the approval we had been granted by the lead NHS organization. We maintained detailed records of the responses to our application, subsequent correspondence, additional paperwork requested, and time spent on the approval process.

Setting: The UK Research Governance Framework, which regulates all research conducted in health and social care settings.

Participants: All PCOs in England and Wales.

Interventions: None.

Main Outcome Measures: Time taken to obtain approval to undertake a telephone interview with a health service manager.

Results: We were unable to establish contact with 13 (4%) PCOs. Six months after submitting our application we had received approval from 259/316 (82%) PCOs and were still awaiting a verdict from 41 (13%). The median time to approval was 56 days (IQR 42-72). Overall, an estimated 318 staff-hours were spent completing supplementary forms, providing additional information and chasing up dormant applications.

Conclusions: Recent initiatives to 'streamline' research governance approval have failed to address the problems that face researchers undertaking multi-centre studies. There is an urgent need to develop a simpler process that allows low risk research to take place without threatening staff morale and endangering the quality of the research outputs. In the meantime, we advise researchers to allow far greater time than might reasonably be envisioned to obtain research governance approval.

Citing Articles

Design and implementation of a large and complex trial in emergency medical services.

Robinson M, Taylor J, Brett S, Nolan J, Thomas M, Reeves B Trials. 2019; 20(1):108.

PMID: 30736841 PMC: 6368693. DOI: 10.1186/s13063-019-3203-0.


From awareness to involvement? A qualitative study of respiratory patients' awareness of health service change.

Kielmann T, Huby G, Powell A, Sheikh A, Price D, Williams S Health Expect. 2010; 14(3):321-33.

PMID: 21029282 PMC: 5060583. DOI: 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2010.00631.x.


Ethics review as a component of institutional approval for a multicentre continuous quality improvement project: the investigator's perspective.

Ezzat H, Ross S, von Dadelszen P, Morris T, Liston R, Magee L BMC Health Serv Res. 2010; 10:223.

PMID: 20673343 PMC: 2921081. DOI: 10.1186/1472-6963-10-223.


One stop or full stop? The continuing challenges for researchers despite the new streamlined NHS research governance process.

Thompson A, France E BMC Health Serv Res. 2010; 10:124.

PMID: 20465819 PMC: 2882919. DOI: 10.1186/1472-6963-10-124.


How the NHS research governance procedures could be modified to greatly strengthen clinical research.

Haynes R, Bowman L, Rahimi K, Armitage J Clin Med (Lond). 2010; 10(2):127-9.

PMID: 20437980 PMC: 4952081. DOI: 10.7861/clinmedicine.10-2-127.


References
1.
Caan W . Research bureaucracy in the United Kingdom: good governance is needed. BMJ. 2004; 329(7466):623. PMC: 516697. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.329.7466.623-a. View

2.
Denholm J . Research bureaucracy in the United Kingdom: research governance is about protection, not convenience. BMJ. 2004; 329(7466):623. PMC: 516698. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.329.7466.623-b. View

3.
Salisbury C, Leese B, McManus R . Ensuring that research governance supports rather than stifles research. Br J Gen Pract. 2005; 55(510):4-5. PMC: 1266235. View

4.
Elwyn G, Seagrove A, Thorne K, Cheung W . Ethics and research governance in a multicentre study: add 150 days to your study protocol. BMJ. 2005; 330(7495):847. PMC: 556088. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.330.7495.847. View

5.
Boshier A, Shakir S, Telfer P, Behr E, Pakrashi T, Camm A . The negative effect of red tape on research. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2005; 14(6):373-6. DOI: 10.1002/pds.1116. View