» Articles » PMID: 17462091

Management of Headache Disorders: Design of a Randomised Clinical Trial Screening for Prognostic Patient Characteristics

Overview
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialties Orthopedics
Physiology
Date 2007 Apr 28
PMID 17462091
Citations 5
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Treatment of headache disorders is not always optimal. Patients are treated in multiple ways, and the lack of scientific arguments for referral and the insufficient implementation of guidelines result in unclear treatment strategies. The coexistence of headache and neck pain can lead to the referral to a musculoskeletal physiotherapist. This treatment can only be successful if an underlying cervical segmental dysfunction is present. In such cases a physical treatment can be a valuable option that should be considered. The aim of this study is to identify prognostic therapeutic patient characteristics and to increase the number of correct physiotherapy referrals.

Methods/design: This trial is designed to identify patient characteristics which can influence the prognosis of the patient. Patients with recurrent headache and co-existent neck pain are recruited via a multicenter setup. After screening for eligibility, subjects are tested at baseline and randomly allocated to one of two treatment groups. Testing includes the administering of questionnaires (a Headache Diagnosis Questionnaire, Headache Inventory List and the Headache Impact Test (HIT-6)) and physical tests (Thermal Stimuli, Manual Cervical Spine Examination and Pressure Algometry). Treatment groups are a usual care group (UC) administered by the General Practitioner (GP) and a usual care plus musculoskeletal physiotherapy treatment group (UCMT). UC is based on the Dutch GP Guideline for Headache. UCMT consists of the UC plus a combination of exercises and spinal cervical mobilisations. Follow-up measurements consist of the completion of the Headache Inventory List, the HIT-6 and scoring of the global perceived effect (GPE). The latter allowing the distinction between responders (positive effect) and non-responders (no effect or worse). Logistic regression analysis will be used to identify the specific patient characteristics of the responders and the non-responders. The additional value of the musculoskeletal physiotherapy will be examined. Follow-up measurements up to 52 weeks are scheduled.

Discussion: This trial aims to identify prognostic patient characteristics, in order to supply a useful diagnostic tool for all health care workers, dealing with headache sufferers.

Citing Articles

Is the cervical lordosis a key biomechanical biomarker in cervicogenic headache?: a Chiropractic Biophysics case report with follow-up.

Fortner M, Woodham T, Oakley P, Harrison D J Phys Ther Sci. 2022; 34(2):167-171.

PMID: 35221522 PMC: 8860691. DOI: 10.1589/jpts.34.167.


Does restoration of sagittal cervical alignment improve cervicogenic headache pain and disability: A 2-year pilot randomized controlled trial.

Moustafa I, Diab A, Shousha T, Harrison D Heliyon. 2021; 7(3):e06467.

PMID: 33786392 PMC: 7988315. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e06467.


Comparison of the efficacy between conventional moxibustion and smoke-free moxibustion on knee osteoarthritis: study protocol of a randomized controlled trial.

Zhu L, Zhou J, Luo L, Wang X, Peng J, Chen S Trials. 2017; 18(1):188.

PMID: 28438185 PMC: 5402673. DOI: 10.1186/s13063-017-1846-2.


Effect of tens on pain in relation to central sensitization in patients with osteoarthritis of the knee: study protocol of a randomized controlled trial.

Beckwee D, De Hertogh W, Lievens P, Bautmans I, Vaes P Trials. 2012; 13:21.

PMID: 22353582 PMC: 3307484. DOI: 10.1186/1745-6215-13-21.


Preliminary results, methodological considerations and recruitment difficulties of a randomised clinical trial comparing two treatment regimens for patients with headache and neck pain.

De Hertogh W, Vaes P, Devroey D, Louis P, Carpay H, Truijen S BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2009; 10:115.

PMID: 19775434 PMC: 2758835. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2474-10-115.

References
1.
Bendtsen L . Central sensitization in tension-type headache--possible pathophysiological mechanisms. Cephalalgia. 2000; 20(5):486-508. DOI: 10.1046/j.1468-2982.2000.00070.x. View

2.
van Suijlekom H, Lame I, Stomp-van den Berg S, Kessels A, Weber W . Quality of life of patients with cervicogenic headache: a comparison with control subjects and patients with migraine or tension-type headache. Headache. 2003; 43(10):1034-41. DOI: 10.1046/j.1526-4610.2003.03204.x. View

3.
Lipton R, Stewart W, Simon D . Medical consultation for migraine: results from the American Migraine Study. Headache. 1998; 38(2):87-96. DOI: 10.1046/j.1526-4610.1998.3802087.x. View

4.
Walling A, Woolley D, Molgaard C, Kallail K . Patient satisfaction with migraine management by family physicians. J Am Board Fam Pract. 2005; 18(6):563-6. DOI: 10.3122/jabfm.18.6.563. View

5.
Veenhof C, Dekker J, Bijlsma J, van den Ende C . Influence of various recruitment strategies on the study population and outcome of a randomized controlled trial involving patients with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee. Arthritis Rheum. 2005; 53(3):375-82. DOI: 10.1002/art.21171. View