» Articles » PMID: 17443368

What Are the Essential Elements to Enable Patient Participation in Medical Decision Making?

Overview
Publisher Springer
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2007 Apr 20
PMID 17443368
Citations 52
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Patient participation in shared decision making (SDM) results in increased patient knowledge, adherence, and improved outcomes. Despite the benefits of the SDM model, many patients do not attain the level of participation they desire.

Objective: To gain a more complete understanding of the essential elements, or the prerequisites, critical to active patient participation in medical decision making from the patient's perspective.

Design: Qualitative study.

Setting: Individual, in-depth patient interviews were conducted until thematic saturation was reached. Two analysts independently read the transcripts and jointly developed a list of codes.

Patients: Twenty-six consecutive subjects drawn from community dwelling subjects undergoing bone density measurements.

Measurements: Respondents' experiences and beliefs related to patient participation in SDM.

Results: Five elements were repeatedly described by respondents as being essential to enable patient participation in medical decision making: (1) patient knowledge, (2) explicit encouragement of patient participation by physicians, (3) appreciation of the patient's responsibility/rights to play an active role in decision making, (4) awareness of choice, and (5) time.

Limitations: The generalizability of the results is limited by the homogeneity of the study sample.

Conclusions: Our findings have important clinical implications and suggest that several needs must be met before patients can become active participants in decisions related to their health care. These needs include ensuring that patients (1) appreciate that there is uncertainty in medicine and "buy in" to the importance of active patient participation in decisions related to their health care, (2) understand the trade-offs related to available options, and (3) have the opportunity to discuss these options with their physician to arrive at a decision concordant with their values.

Citing Articles

Person-centred care during treatment with nasal esketamine - a qualitative study.

Klysing L, Larsson I, Westberg K BMC Nurs. 2025; 24(1):287.

PMID: 40087713 DOI: 10.1186/s12912-025-02943-y.


How Social Connectedness Helps Patients Stay Home After Hospital at Home Enrollment: A Mixed Methods Study.

Ledford C, Cafferty L, Lee E, Hayes H, Ede D, Hodges B J Gen Intern Med. 2024; 39(14):2671-2678.

PMID: 38724740 PMC: 11534937. DOI: 10.1007/s11606-024-08785-9.


From precision medicine to precision care: Choosing and using precision medicine in the context of multimorbidity.

Bierman A, Burke B, Comfort L, Gerstein M, Mueller N, Umscheid C Camb Prism Precis Med. 2024; 1:e19.

PMID: 38550931 PMC: 10953765. DOI: 10.1017/pcm.2023.8.


Self-efficacy of advanced cancer patients for participation in treatment-related decision-making in six European countries: the ACTION study.

Yildiz B, Korfage I, Deliens L, Preston N, Miccinesi G, Kodba-ceh H Support Care Cancer. 2023; 31(9):512.

PMID: 37552324 PMC: 10409662. DOI: 10.1007/s00520-023-07974-2.


"Why Do We Always Have to Focus on the Bad": A Strengths-Based Approach to Identify the Positive Aspects of Care From the Perspective of Older Adults Using a Secondary Qualitative Analysis.

Kokorelias K, Singh H, Nelson M, Hitzig S J Patient Exp. 2023; 10:23743735231188841.

PMID: 37547702 PMC: 10399251. DOI: 10.1177/23743735231188841.


References
1.
Souchek J, Stacks J, BRODY B, Ashton C, Giesler R, Byrne M . A trial for comparing methods for eliciting treatment preferences from men with advanced prostate cancer: results from the initial visit. Med Care. 2000; 38(10):1040-50. DOI: 10.1097/00005650-200010000-00008. View

2.
Say R, Thomson R . The importance of patient preferences in treatment decisions--challenges for doctors. BMJ. 2003; 327(7414):542-5. PMC: 192849. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.327.7414.542. View

3.
MacFarlane J, Holmes W, Gard P, Thornhill D, Macfarlane R, Hubbard R . Reducing antibiotic use for acute bronchitis in primary care: blinded, randomised controlled trial of patient information leaflet. BMJ. 2002; 324(7329):91-4. PMC: 64506. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.324.7329.91. View

4.
Keating N, Guadagnoli E, Landrum M, Borbas C, Weeks J . Treatment decision making in early-stage breast cancer: should surgeons match patients' desired level of involvement?. J Clin Oncol. 2002; 20(6):1473-9. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2002.20.6.1473. View

5.
Kennedy A, Sculpher M, Coulter A, Dwyer N, Rees M, Abrams K . Effects of decision aids for menorrhagia on treatment choices, health outcomes, and costs: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2002; 288(21):2701-8. DOI: 10.1001/jama.288.21.2701. View