» Articles » PMID: 17441236

A Comparison of the Performance of Digital Mammography Systems

Overview
Journal Med Phys
Specialty Biophysics
Date 2007 Apr 19
PMID 17441236
Citations 14
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

An objective analysis of image quality parameters was performed for six digital mammography systems. The presampled modulation transfer function (MTF), normalized noise power spectrum (NNPS), and detective quantum efficiency (DQE) for the systems were determined at different doses, for 28 kVp with a Mo/Mo or W/Al target/filter combination and 2 mm of additional aluminium filtration. The flat-panel units have higher MTF and DQE in the mid to high frequency range than standard CR systems. The highest DQE, over the whole dose range, is for the slit-scanning direct photon counting system. Dual-side read CR can overcome the inherent x-ray absorption and signal collection limitations of standard CR mammography, improving the low-frequency DQE by 40%, to the same level as full-field systems, but it does not improve the poor spatial resolution of phosphor.

Citing Articles

Comprehensive image quality comparison of conventional and new flat panel detectors under bedside chest radiography beam conditions.

Maruyama S, Saitou H Radiol Phys Technol. 2024; 18(1):94-103.

PMID: 39538057 DOI: 10.1007/s12194-024-00859-x.


Simulation Analysis on the Performance of a Circular-Edge Technique in Measurements of the Modulation Transfer Function.

Maruyama S J Med Phys. 2023; 48(1):90-97.

PMID: 37342601 PMC: 10277299. DOI: 10.4103/jmp.jmp_54_22.


Effect of beam quality and readout direction in the edge profile on the modulation transfer function of photostimulable phosphor systems via the edge method.

Takarabe S, Kuramoto T, Shibayama Y, Tsuru H, Tatsumi M, Kato T J Med Imaging (Bellingham). 2021; 8(4):043501.

PMID: 34307736 PMC: 8291077. DOI: 10.1117/1.JMI.8.4.043501.


On the relevance of modulation transfer function measurements in digital mammography quality control.

Wigati K, Marshall N, Lemmens K, Binst J, Jacobs A, Cockmartin L J Med Imaging (Bellingham). 2021; 8(2):023505.

PMID: 33937435 PMC: 8076849. DOI: 10.1117/1.JMI.8.2.023505.


On the Response of a Micro Non-Destructive Testing X-ray Detector.

Linardatos D, Koukou V, Martini N, Konstantinidis A, Bakas A, Fountos G Materials (Basel). 2021; 14(4).

PMID: 33668484 PMC: 7917680. DOI: 10.3390/ma14040888.