» Articles » PMID: 17437643

Prediction of Flexible/rigid Regions from Protein Sequences Using K-spaced Amino Acid Pairs

Overview
Journal BMC Struct Biol
Publisher Biomed Central
Date 2007 Apr 18
PMID 17437643
Citations 53
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Traditionally, it is believed that the native structure of a protein corresponds to a global minimum of its free energy. However, with the growing number of known tertiary (3D) protein structures, researchers have discovered that some proteins can alter their structures in response to a change in their surroundings or with the help of other proteins or ligands. Such structural shifts play a crucial role with respect to the protein function. To this end, we propose a machine learning method for the prediction of the flexible/rigid regions of proteins (referred to as FlexRP); the method is based on a novel sequence representation and feature selection. Knowledge of the flexible/rigid regions may provide insights into the protein folding process and the 3D structure prediction.

Results: The flexible/rigid regions were defined based on a dataset, which includes protein sequences that have multiple experimental structures, and which was previously used to study the structural conservation of proteins. Sequences drawn from this dataset were represented based on feature sets that were proposed in prior research, such as PSI-BLAST profiles, composition vector and binary sequence encoding, and a newly proposed representation based on frequencies of k-spaced amino acid pairs. These representations were processed by feature selection to reduce the dimensionality. Several machine learning methods for the prediction of flexible/rigid regions and two recently proposed methods for the prediction of conformational changes and unstructured regions were compared with the proposed method. The FlexRP method, which applies Logistic Regression and collocation-based representation with 95 features, obtained 79.5% accuracy. The two runner-up methods, which apply the same sequence representation and Support Vector Machines (SVM) and Naïve Bayes classifiers, obtained 79.2% and 78.4% accuracy, respectively. The remaining considered methods are characterized by accuracies below 70%. Finally, the Naïve Bayes method is shown to provide the highest sensitivity for the prediction of flexible regions, while FlexRP and SVM give the highest sensitivity for rigid regions.

Conclusion: A new sequence representation that uses k-spaced amino acid pairs is shown to be the most efficient in the prediction of the flexible/rigid regions of protein sequences. The proposed FlexRP method provides the highest prediction accuracy of about 80%. The experimental tests show that the FlexRP and SVM methods achieved high overall accuracy and the highest sensitivity for rigid regions, while the best quality of the predictions for flexible regions is achieved by the Naïve Bayes method.

Citing Articles

PredPSP: a novel computational tool to discover pathway-specific photosynthetic proteins in plants.

Meher P, Pradhan U, Sethi P, Naha S, Gupta A, Parsad R Plant Mol Biol. 2024; 114(5):106.

PMID: 39316155 DOI: 10.1007/s11103-024-01500-6.


ProSol-multi: Protein solubility prediction via amino acids multi-level correlation and discriminative distribution.

Ghafoor H, Asim M, Ibrahim M, Dengel A Heliyon. 2024; 10(17):e36041.

PMID: 39281576 PMC: 11401092. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e36041.


PredIL13: Stacking a variety of machine and deep learning methods with ESM-2 language model for identifying IL13-inducing peptides.

Kurata H, Harun-Or-Roshid M, Tsukiyama S, Maeda K PLoS One. 2024; 19(8):e0309078.

PMID: 39172871 PMC: 11340954. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0309078.


PLMC: Language Model of Protein Sequences Enhances Protein Crystallization Prediction.

Xiong D, U K, Sun J, Cribbs A Interdiscip Sci. 2024; 16(4):802-813.

PMID: 39155325 DOI: 10.1007/s12539-024-00639-6.


PMTPred: machine-learning-based prediction of protein methyltransferases using the composition of k-spaced amino acid pairs.

Yadav A, Gupta P, Singh T Mol Divers. 2024; 28(4):2301-2315.

PMID: 39033257 DOI: 10.1007/s11030-024-10937-2.


References
1.
Schlessinger A, Rost B . Protein flexibility and rigidity predicted from sequence. Proteins. 2005; 61(1):115-26. DOI: 10.1002/prot.20587. View

2.
Hertz T, Yanover C . PepDist: a new framework for protein-peptide binding prediction based on learning peptide distance functions. BMC Bioinformatics. 2006; 7 Suppl 1:S3. PMC: 1810314. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2105-7-S1-S3. View

3.
Kedarisetti K, Kurgan L, Dick S . Classifier ensembles for protein structural class prediction with varying homology. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2006; 348(3):981-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2006.07.141. View

4.
Chen C, Tian Y, Zou X, Cai P, Mo J . Using pseudo-amino acid composition and support vector machine to predict protein structural class. J Theor Biol. 2006; 243(3):444-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2006.06.025. View

5.
Ruan J, Chen K, Tuszynski J, Kurgan L . Quantitative analysis of the conservation of the tertiary structure of protein segments. Protein J. 2006; 25(5):301-15. DOI: 10.1007/s10930-006-9016-5. View